Why? Why can't I just knock something up and post it? If it bothers you so much, don't look.
Why? Why can't I just knock something up and post it? If it bothers you so much, don't look.
Kiat ->
Multiple PODs:
Independent Biafra
Enver Hoxha don't rule Albania (soviet puppet, whereas in OTL Albania was against both USSR and Chine, and Yugoslavia), but Xoce (pro-tito albanian) isn't the boss either, maybe a soviet-sided government?
Greater Abyssinia : Italia colonize Ethiopia in XIX and create a big colony with Erytrhea, Somalia, Ethiopia and with French and English Somalia?
1945 : Mongolia is annexed as Tannu-Tuva
Afghanistan War is winned by USSR
1945 : Gilan Sovietic Republic extend itself on all northern Persia
1949 : Not nationalist China in Taiwan
1919 : Creation of an Arabian Kingdom united, but it's divied in two parties when Seud takes Mecca
Kadhafi annex Azuzu band
Durable unifiation of Senegal and Gambia in Senegambia, and after, with Guinea
1919 Greece annex Eastern Thracia
Imperial Russia doesn't sell Alaska
India keep ALL Kashmir
It's all that i'm seeing so...The older POD will be That Russia doesn't sell Alaska...
Good work of taking advantage of Krall's absence.
Mmm...For your corrected map i would say...Russia wins Crimea War?
A reversed earth for it, too! Nice!The world of Colony-1 the year of human arrival. The aliens history was very different in the past and just happens to have converged to similarity when the human expiditionary force arrived.
View attachment 79316
I think he goes too far. There's a very clearly demarcated line between helping someone new get better at mapping and personally insulting them.I thought it was pretty obvious Krall's post was done in jest, even towards himself.
Frankly, I almost always agree with Krall; we have too much 30-second MSPaint shit going on nowadays.
Mmm...For me GB would be too obsseded by "continental balance" to permit that Russia and Austria just expands themselves too big.
It's interesant anyway, but i think this situation would lead to a war with two sides : Austria/Russia and France/Prussia and maybe United Kingdom in the 1870's with the second side as winner with this changes
-Italian unification under France supervision in north and UK in south, and with an independent papal states as border between the two zones.
-Greater German Unification and Habsurgh became Emperors of Hungary
-Resurrection of a Puppet Ottoman Empire, limited in the north of ancient, with gains for UK in Middle-East and France in Africa, and OE became more french-sided
-Puppet State of Poland, dominated by Germany
-Gains in Baltic for Germany
-If southern Germany fight in Austria Side, France would gain Palatinate (yummy, said Napoleon III)
Napoleon stay on Elba: 1950(if everything else is just like OTL)
the British were Prussian close allies, so during 1930 they helped them crush the Belgian Revolt. Belgium remained under Prussian and then German control until WWI.
Austrian dominions in western Germany were annexed after the Austro-Prussian War.
After WWI France regain Alsace and get Belgium, Italy get Alto-Adige/Sudtirol and Austria become a divided country (ok, i know that with that eventuality maybe at Versailles things would be gone somewhat different )
WWII went as we know and here's Europe in the '50s with a slightly bigger West Germany and a still divided Austria.
what do you think is better? a divided Austria? Italy did not annexed Alto-Adige/Sudtirol? an indipendent Northtyrol? a german northtyrol?
Krall's post wasn't that great. It was just common sense. The map wasn't that great. This cult of personality around him is rather inane. And besides, I don't even know what "Epic Win' means.