What If Japan faced war crime trials?

I think that's a big part of the reason why Filipinos are so pro-American despite stuff like this. The Imperial Japanese were simply so much worse than the Americans (who were always kinda half-hearted in their colonization IIRC), and the Philippines got independence right after the war ended. Thus, the U.S. is remembered at least as much as liberators as they are as occupiers.
Really, They seem to be the same, maybe much worst as they killed up to 1/5 to 1/4 of the population of the islands. If Aguinaldo marched to Manila and storms the American positions after they attacked the Filipino forces in Santa Mesa and successfully had Mckinley and co withdraw and recognize PI, I dont think the Philippines will go like the US.

Examples of US attrocities include killing all people above ten in Samar

PI doesnt even wanted independence immediately after the ww2, they wanted time to rebuild with US aid then independence like what Roosevelt promised if I remember correctly. the US abandoned PI, a war torn country that can be compared to Poland to the extent of damage
 
Last edited:
Really, They seem to be the same, maybe much worst as they killed up to 1/5 to 1/4 of the population of the islands.
I'm puzzled. How does 250,000 civilian dead out of a population of 6.6 million (1901) come out to 1/5-1/4 of the population killed off?

PI doesnt even wanted independence immediately after the ww2
My impression is that Quezon and Osmeña were adamant about holding the U.S. to the 1946 independence timeline.
 
Jesus you know I'm shocked more people don't know about Japan's war crimes during WW2. Yes the Nazis did some horrible shit but the Japannese did some thing that wer just as horrific like the Rape of Nanjing for example was just horrific and disgusting.

TBH three big factors

1). were are you standing and who you are talking to, if you are in China or SEAisa yep they know (not so much in Japan though ironically). Or if you had POWs coming home from those areas.

2). We often tend to use one horrific events as short hand for all of them if they all took place at roughly teh same time for roughly the same reasons,

3). Sheer numbness at the frankly large numbers of mass murders etc committed by the axis. And there always seems to be new one to learn about.


The issue is the axis pretty much just killed everywhere they went, either as direct goal or as a natural result of their policies. Take Indonesia (Dutch East Indies at the time), so OK they were conquered and occupied in 1942. Now the Indonesians were not targeted by Japanese racial ideology any more than any other SEAsian nation, so there was no extermination effort like you saw with German death camps, they were just there and they had resources the Japanese wanted so became part of their Japanese empire. But 3-4m died in about 4 years as a direct result of Japanese policies there
 
Really, They seem to be the same, maybe much worst as they killed up to 1/5 to 1/4 of the population of the islands. If Aguinaldo marched to Manila and storms the American positions after they attacked the Filipino forces in Santa Mesa and successfully had Mckinley and co withdraw and recognize PI, I dont think the Philippines will go like the US.

Examples of US attrocities include killing all people above ten in Samar

PI doesnt even wanted independence immediately after the ww2, they wanted time to rebuild with US aid then independence like what Roosevelt promised if I remember correctly. the US abandoned PI, a war torn country that can be compared to Poland to the extent of damage
Agreed, though perhaps not on the "much worse" part. As a Filipino far too many people forget the US' own dark history in this country.

Arguably the biggest difference between the American and Japanese conquests is that the American one happened 40 years earlier - and thus fainter in historical memory.

Of course that is not to imply they are totally the same[1]; I suppose the Americans were better in that they did eventually grant us independence (if still with neo-colonial baggage - as a quid-pro-quo for "freedom" they passed a law that gave US corporations access to our natural resources for a couple of decades)

[1] But rather to say there were more similarities than differences
 
The issue is the axis pretty much just killed everywhere they went, either as direct goal or as a natural result of their policies. Take Indonesia (Dutch East Indies at the time), so OK they were conquered and occupied in 1942. Now the Indonesians were not targeted by Japanese racial ideology any more than any other SEAsian nation, so there was no extermination effort like you saw with German death camps, they were just there and they had resources the Japanese wanted so became part of their Japanese empire. But 3-4m died in about 4 years as a direct result of Japanese policies there
And yet, because of the Nationalist connections with the Japanese occupation (especially Soekarno) this is also fairly downplayed.
 
I'm puzzled. How does 250,000 civilian dead out of a population of 6.6 million (1901) come out to 1/5-1/4 of the population killed off?
Philippine population is about 7.8M in 1898 and 8M in 1900 the estimates of deaths are mainly ranging 200K to 2M in worst case. where did u get ur population, it seems that its too low
 
Last edited:
PI doesnt even wanted independence immediately after the ww2, they wanted time to rebuild with US aid then independence like what Roosevelt promised if I remember correctly. the US abandoned PI, a war torn country that can be compared to Poland to the extent of damage
It's not only the Filipinos that wanted independence. The U.S. saw that holding on to the Philippines for another 10 years would be waste of resources. Hence, this is why the Tydings-McDuffie Act was signed in 1934 to give transition for eventual independence by 1945. WWII delayed by another year.

Even though independent, the U.S. continued to house bases in the Philippines until 1992.
 
The more I learn the more I wonder how some of these folks got away? Seriously who the hell was in charge?
In practice, by the time the Tokyo War Crime Tribunals started Americans just wanted to get them over with as quickly as possible. Pretty much everyone involved in the process thought the Tribunals pretty much as a joke because there were so many issues in how they were organized.
 
Some info I got from Reddit regarding Masanobu Tsuji
One user said, Guomindang, said:
CIA documents report that Tsuji was alive as of August 8th, 1962 and after returning to Vientiane from Hanoi, was kidnapped and detained in Yunan, China by the Communist Party of China, who planned to re-educate him and appoint him head of the Southeast Asia Strategy Committee Planning Division and have him to make a statement of some kind that would undermine American–Japanese relations and Japan's standing in southeast Asia, and that rightists in the Communist Party of China were trying to free him in return for support from the Japanese government, and that the Communist Party of China consented to allowing Japanese government representatives to enter Yunan via Laos to interview Tsuji to prove that he was alive. Also, the documents report that Tsuji's son, Toru Tsuji, had gone to Hong Kong to rescue his father. According to CIA documents dated September 11th, 1962, the CIA Far East Division came into possession in May earlier that year of a letter allegedly handwritten by Tsuji. Handwriting analysis results produced on August 24th determined that the letter was written by Tsuji himself.
ComradeCommissary said:
It’s unreliable. They do not have his remain. Not to mention, the CIA highly doubts his anti-communist stance as it was likely a ruse to discourage the Western suspicions on his activities. The guy was a Pan-Asianist who held the belief of Asians above the West more than any socialism and communism. A lot of Japanese, who defected to Viet Minh, shared the same view.

This is why the US did not completely confirm his death. The CIA is not omniscient, so most of their intels may not be 100% accurate.
 
I suppose that trying and hanging him in Manila would have been merciful compared to whatever Chinese red guards likely did to him.

Still, it ought to have been us (and the Filipinos) who dished out the justice to him.
 
I suppose that trying and hanging him in Manila would have been merciful compared to whatever Chinese red guards likely did to him.

Still, it ought to have been us (and the Filipinos) who dished out the justice to him.
Tsuji struck a deal with the Chinese communists or the the Chinese communists made a deal with him that they will let him live as long as he would undermine U.S.-Japan relations in the post-war world. Communists and the followers of the Pan-Asian belief have something in common: wanting foreign influence out. So naturally, Tsuji would be a useful tool for Beijing. They did let him go in 1948 and once he returned to Japan, he ran for politics in 1952.

The Japanese even erected a statue for Tsuji which is just as controversial as Yasukuni Shrine.
 
Tsuji struck a deal with the Chinese communists or the the Chinese communists made a deal with him that they will let him live as long as he would undermine U.S.-Japan relations in the post-war world. Communists and the followers of the Pan-Asian belief have something in common: wanting foreign influence out. So naturally, Tsuji would be a useful tool for Beijing. They did let him go in 1948 and once he returned to Japan, he ran for politics in 1952.

The Japanese even erected a statue for Tsuji which is just as controversial as Yasukuni Shrine.

I was referring to the reports of what may have happened to him in 1961-62, not in 1945-48.

But yes, his reception when he returned to Japan in 1948 was disgraceful - more than just "a bit stomach churning." It's a black mark on MacArthur's record that he didn't have him run to ground as soon as word got out that he was back.
 
I was referring to the reports of what may have happened to him in 1961-62, not in 1945-48.
That's one of those questions that will remain unsolved. Not much reference materials available nor has the Japanese, the Vietnamese, the PRC, and the CIA have a say on it.
 
Found some interesting reference material.




Someone brought up why Unit 731 was more horrible than Nazi experiments. The Front has a video of it:
 
There's a similar thread regarding aged Nazi criminals especially the recent escapee that was captured.

Fleeing Nazi is going to be forced to face justice.

You see the comments that even trying a 96 year old would bring justice for the victims. The same would have happened if notorious war criminals like Masanobu Tsuji or Josef Mengele were given the fair trial and punishment.
 

kham_coc

Banned
There's a similar thread regarding aged Nazi criminals especially the recent escapee that was captured.

Fleeing Nazi is going to be forced to face justice.

You see the comments that even trying a 96 year old would bring justice for the victims. The same would have happened if notorious war criminals like Masanobu Tsuji or Josef Mengele were given the fair trial and punishment.

You do know the vast majority of these 90 year old being charged didn't flee?
They just weren't charged at the time, their primary crime seems to have been surviving until their numbers became manageable.
 
You do know the vast majority of these 90 year old being charged didn't flee?
They just weren't charged at the time, their primary crime seems to have been surviving until their numbers became manageable.

More about that at the time, after a while it was thought that keep going after them will have weakned the West German goverment so they simply stop looking after them, like in Italy they have kept all the documentation but never really pursued them unless they have committed some real horrible crime
 
Top