Edward the confessor had no children if he had a daughter born in 1050 would the Norman conquest still happen who would she marry
Yes, her to william's eldest son robert.I could see her being marred of into the Norman dynasty if the conquest still happens
It supposes Edward is the most powerful man in the kingdom, which he isn't.What if Edward marries her off to Robert Curthose
Yes. There still was little to no precedent for queens regnant in England then. They'd still have to choose a new king and said king still would have to deal with Harald Hardrada and William's claims. I can see whoever prevails marrying Edward's daughter to one of his sons to help legitimize themselves further, though.
I don’t think so, but there was precedence for a brother in law to inherit, like how Wessex took over Mercia?! That said, if the Wittengamot rubber stamps it, then screw precedence,. After Canute became king though, I don’t think people really cared about precedence.Was there any precedent for a son-in-law to inherit?
So, girl is raised very carefully by her mother and marries one of Harold's five sons, probably Godwin who is likely the eldest and Harold is regent for a couple years. William has no basis to contest the throne and Harald may or may not challenge her husband/king.
hmm he would have to have sex first to get a child so would not be the confessor in the first place.Edward the confessor had no children if he had a daughter born in 1050 would the Norman conquest still happen who would she marry