Tenth Crusade

Throughout the 1270's and 1280's King Edward I of England was engaged in a correspondence with a succession of Popes - 6 in 10 years - over the Holy Land. Ever since he had been forced to abandon Acre in the 9th Crusade - Edward was the only man not to agree to Baibar's terms - the English King had always intended to return but in his talks with the Papacy he had insisted that domestic affairs had to be settled first.

Those domestic affairs involved the conquest and pacification of the Welsh and by 1284 this was pretty much accomplished. During his occupation with the Welsh, Edward had repeatedly stressed that his brother - Edmund Crouchback - was an experianced Crusader who would make a suitable substitute as the leader of a Crusader Army in his place but the Papacy had refused. Only Edward, they said, was a leader of international renown and pretiege enough to rally Christendom behind the cause.

With the Welsh pacified, King Edward now agreed to take the cross and to support his new Crusade he could expect significant financial support from Rome. Pope Martin IV had raised £130,000 for the venture but Edward knew from his first Crusade that this sum would not be enough - Edward's first Crusade had cost £100,000 and been a failure, despite the increase to his own reputation that followed. To raise further funds the Pope suggested another three year tax while Edward suggested a ten year one instead and they were in deadlock.

But this was not the main problem for a new Crusade. That came in the form of in-fighting amungst the Christian rulers of Europe.

Charles of Anjou- King of Sicily - had acquired Albania and the title as King of Jerusalem in his persuit of a Mediterranean Empire and looked to take Constantinople. But in this persuit he had come down hard on his Sicilian subject with demands for money and troops and in 1283 they rose up in rebellion against him. Had they been alone he could have quashed this rebellion but they were supported by King Peter of Aragon who sought to enforce his wifes claim on the island. In response Philip III of France was dragged into the conflict in support of his nephew Charles and declared war on Aragon

The Papacy was not happy. Sicily was their island and only the Pope could decide who ruled it and the Pope wanted Charles of Anjou to be its King. Peter was excommunicated and the Pope gave his support and blessing to Philip and the French and directed them to overthrow Peter. Pope Martin had even gone so far as to designate it as a Crusade.

Both sides now turned to England. Edward was on old friend of Peter and had been arranging the marriage of their eldest children for years while as Duke of Aquitaine he was Philip's swornf man and Philip called on his support in both that capacity and as his cousin. Edward had been able to use the Welsh as an excuse not to pick sides but with them pacified he had to do something so instead of interveening militarilly he offered to arbitrate.

This offer was turned down by Philip and the latest in a long line of debates over Edward's responsibilites as lord of Gascony began.

Neither the death of Charles of Anjou or Pope Martin were enough to avoid war and the French crossed the Pyrenees. This would have been the end of Edward's dreams of Crusade but a month or so later the news arrived, Philip III was dead, died with his army as it was wracked with disease. A lucky break for King Peter, who lasted only six more weeks before he, himself, died.

This left the young Philip IV and Alfonso III in the place of their fathers and Philip IV wasted little time in bringing the King of England in as arbitrator.

The main issues were over Sicily and the imprisonment of Charles of Salerno. Edward secured the relase of Charles of Salerno by an excahnge of hostages - initiatilly French, the changed to members of his own court until echanged for members of Charles of Salerno's Duchy - and £50,000 - £30,000 of which came from Edward's coffers - but the issue of Sicily was delayed because of the death of Pope Honorus IV and was not settled until long after Edward had left the Continent. He had secured the release of Charles of Salerno and created an avenue for negotiations between Aragon and the Papacy, and that was enough.

Edward's dreams of crusade were resurrected and even while he was attempting to assert the rights he and most of his countrymen believed the English King held over the Scots he dreamed of returning to the Holy Land.

His dreams were once more dashed by the French. A naval clash between Normans on one side and the Gascons and English on the other (probably instigated by Charles of Valois - who had been proclaimed King of Aragon before the French invasion and never actually held court there but refused to relinquish his cliam to the title despite having no hope of taking the throne and blamed Edward's intervention for robbing him of this title) gave the French the pretext to close around Gascony and look to take control.

Edward sought to smooth the matter over and sent official political ambassadors and his brother to appeal for negotiation. Philip IV refused to negotiate in insulting terms - refusing to recognized Edward's right as King for negotiation, recognizing him only as a vassal - while Edmund recieved Philip's blessing as family - he was both Philip's cousin and step-father-in-law - to work out a deal with Philip's wife, mother and mother-in-law to avoid conflict and come to suitable terms for both sides.

The deal was agreed that Edward would relinquish his lands in Gascony voluntarilly along with handing hostages from the region to French costdy then he would submit to a public dressing-down which soon after would be reveresed, his disgressions againsrt France forgiven and his lands restored.

But in this Edward, Edmund and the Royal ladies were decieved. Philip and the French court had no intention of honoring this agreementand when Edward forfilled his part of the bargin Philip used the pretext that the Duke of Aquitaine had failed to answer a summons from the French King to declare his lands forfiet. This led to war between England and France but the French King had been using funds raised for the Crusade to build himself a mighty fleet, thus the French conspiracy was complete and the English were left scrambling to responde.

Though Gascony was later restored to Edward's control by Papal intervention the betrayal of his cousin, the French King, had thown Edward's own kingdom into dissary as Welsh and Scottish rebellions broke out while English troops were mustered to go to the rescue of Gascony and civil war threatened as Edward sought funds and manpower.

But more than anything else the dreams the English King had long held for Crusade were crushed one again. Years later, after he had pacified the Scots between 1305 and 1306 Edward resurrected his dreams of Crusade only to have them dashed once more by the uprising of Robert the Bruce and his own failing health.

So, basically, what if Edward had managed to launch his Crusade at any time between 1284 and 1306? Would it have been doomed to failure no matter what or would the Christian states of Europe somehow manage to pull together to regain some of the land that had been lost?
 
Last edited:
I suspect the failure option. There are just too many rivalries, too many quarrels, too many distractions.

And then, once they reach the Holy Land, they have a much tougher opposition than the First Crusade - or even Third - met. And the Mamelukes have devastated the coastline to boot. How are they securing a foothold?

It's - almost - hopeless.
 
I suspect the failure option. There are just too many rivalries, too many quarrels, too many distractions.

And then, once they reach the Holy Land, they have a much tougher opposition than the First Crusade - or even Third - met. And the Mamelukes have devastated the coastline to boot. How are they securing a foothold?

It's - almost - hopeless.
I agree. They could attack using Cyprus as a base. But this might have provoked Egypt into attacking that island.
 
Hmm, maybe he should take a crack at the Hafsids of Tunisia instead.

Longshanks was determined to return to Acre. That's where his Ninth Crusade had begun and that's where it had failed. It was a significant place for him. If he ever returned to the Holy Land then that would be the place he'd go to first.
 

Razgriz 2K9

Banned
In which case, considering how powerful the Mamluks are, how ruined the coastline is, and how divided Europe is, it's safe to write it off as too implausible to work. It can happen, but he'll be a dead Longshanks.
 
In which case, considering how powerful the Mamluks are, how ruined the coastline is, and how divided Europe is, it's safe to write it off as too implausible to work. It can happen, but he'll be a dead Longshanks.
I agree.
If Edward I dies on this expedition, imagine the chaos in England..(Another story!)
 
I agree.
If Edward I dies on this expedition, imagine the chaos in England..(Another story!)

Why would there be great chaos?

Alphonso (Edward's oldest living son in 1283) is underage and Edward doesn't have any other living male issue - but he does have a younger brother, Edmund.

I'm not saying it would be great, but I think the main thing is going to be Welsh rebellion and barons taking advantage of the situation, not something like the Great Interegnum.
 
Marc Morris, in summarizing Edward's qualities as King, writes that:

The fundamental measure of Edward's widsom however, is that he was a good judge of other people. He could spot frauds (such as the knight who claimed to have been cured of blindness at the tomb of Henry III), and he had a talent for selecting men of outstanding ability to serve him. As one of the preachers in Poitiers put it: 'He did not rule in a frivolous state of mind, nor under the influence of flatterers...but with prudent council og good and wise men.'

Edward did not, as his father had done, try to rule as a tryant and qarrel with his people over money - leading to Civil War - not did his, as his son did, surround himself by favorites and rule without the good judgement of his people. Edward surrounded himself with men of ability and judgement and only rarely did he fail to take their council - when the episode over Philip IV and Gascony occured and the following scramble to raise forces to fight the French being the most obvious case of a time when he ignored them. Men who served him well were rewarded generously, men who failed him were removed with ruthlessness.

On the matter of succession. It was decided shortly after the birth of Edward of Caernarfon and Alfonso's death it that should this son - Edward's forth - fail to make it to adulthood then the crown would pass to his oldest daughter and thus secure the future of England's crown.
 
I completely forgot about daughters.

I wonder how well she would have been accepted. Eleanor is a little underaged, but only by a couple years.
 
Top