We're so used to WWII that we really underestimate how difficult is to conduct an aggressive war against a well-armed opponent.
How (and why) China would conquer Siberia facing the risk of a nuclear shower that would erase their country? Even a limited war would involve high risks for no tangible benefit.
How (and why) China would conquer Siberia facing the risk of a nuclear shower that would erase their country? Even a limited war would involve high risks for no tangible benefit.