Chapter 1: How Liberty Survives
  • Chapter 1: How Liberty Survives

    “On the 9th of April, 1925, the retired German Admiral, Alfred Peter Friedrich von Tirpitz visited the home of Paul von Hindenburg. In the last week, there had been a tumult amongst the German right; no party had been able to gain the majority needed in the first round of German elections, and a second round had been called. The right had nearly unanimously nominated their candidate, Karl Jarres, from the ‘German People’s Party’. However, for Tirpitz, Jarres was not an acceptable candidate.

    Tirpitz was part of a group known as the ‘German Fatherland Party’, which advocated for ‘People’s emperors’ of a military government; they had a great distaste for the republic and the Weimar coalition and had even proposed a coup against it as an acceptable way to achieve their militaristic goals. They proposed the former Generalfeldmarschall Ludendorf take on their perceived role of a military ‘Führer’. However, Ludendorf and his own ‘National Völkisch Freedom Party’ had lost spectacularly in the first round of elections that year, coming below even their hated enemy; the Communists. With the second round of elections approaching and the ‘Weimar Coalition’ candidate Wilhelm Marx gaining an almost clear plurality of votes among the population, Tirpitz sought out the retired Generalfeldmarschall Hindenburg, alongside a young leader of the agrarian nobility to convince him to run.

    Very few know what was actually said or spoken at the meeting between Tirpitz and Hindenburg. Some have speculated that Tirpitz had unintentionally (or perhaps even intentionally given the assertive and strongman personality of the German nationalist) offended Hindenburg in some way, perhaps pushing far too hard with his dream of a militarist Germany reborn under Hindenburg. But what is known is that Tirpitz and his ally from the nobility left Hindenburg's house only hours later, unsuccessful in their endeavor.

    It’s unknown what Hindenburg may have done had he actually run, his popularity among the German right wing being up in the air at best. Some speculate he really would’ve ushered in the militaristic kind of rulership given his personal positions as well as his tentative support for Alfred Hugenberg in 1931. Hindenburg's hypothetical presidency remains a topic of much debate, especially considering the latter years of his term, 1929-1932, would be some of the most defining and tumultuous in the history of the Weimar Republic, as they almost led to the failure of the entire democratic experiment in Germany in our own time.”

    - Republic of Weimar, by Franklin McAdoo


    “Both Jarres and Marx were not wildly different candidates in of themselves. Jarres himself would drift increasingly to the center-right over the course of his presidency, in lock-step with his fellow party members. However, it was all the same an unexpected victory for the German right wing. The years following his election and before the Great Depression were known in the Weimar Republic as Goldene Zwanziger which featured a growing economy and a subsequent decrease in civil discontent. Although this golden age would be only a brief respite in the Republic’s woes. Still, it was an important stepping stone for the German Republic, had Jarres, under the counsel of moderate-minded members of his party like Gustav Streseman, not taken serious precautions to protect German democracy, the German Constitutional Crisis would have certainly been far worse.”

    - The Years of Anarchy: Germany from 1929-1932, by David Schmidt


    “Any democracy that allows its leader to act with complete impunity and disregard for any due processes, sets up its own inevitable failure.”

    - Extract from Gustav Stresemann's speech to the German Reichstag calling for the limitation of Article 48, June 3rd, 1928
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 2: A Black Weekend
  • Chapter 2: A Black Weekend

    “By 1930, production in almost every country, bar Soviet Russia, had collapsed. Falling by some 40% in the worst cases like Germany and America. With factories from the Ruhr steel mills to the Detroit car plants shuttered, entire armies of unemployed workers flooded the streets of major cities. 8 million men and women in America, another 2.5 million in Britain, and 5 million more in Germany.

    These loitering gangs of workless and wageless youths walked the lengths of their cities, and for each street corner they turned, it seemed they were joined by another score of people who had just been put out of work as the depression spread like a plague across the West. With no possible way to pay rent or afford housing; grim-looking shanty towns popped up like ghosts out of the grave on the outskirts of towns, encampments of suitcases and scrap metal with maybe a single blanket between a whole family used for the roof. It’s no surprise living under these conditions that the natural progression of the crisis would lead from hopelessness to violence and revolt.

    There were food riots that broke out in America, especially in the central and south-west, Britain saw a massive miner's strike, and Berlin was quickly racing towards a city-wide civil war in its streets as militias clad in brown shirts and flying red banners clashed with police.

    The 'Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei' (NSDAP)–or 'Nazis'–fed like vultures on the mass hysteria of the German population, playing up their frustrations with the government to net themselves massive gains in the Reichstag and accelerating the party from fringe right-wing groups to one of the largest single political parties in Germany. Of course, it was not only the government the Nazis went after, but they also attacked the Entente powers, the Communists, the Socialists, the Gypsies [1], and most of all, the Jews. Violence in Berlin became a daily norm. So it is no surprise that as the depression effects began to explode in coups across the globe, from Portugal to Brazil, Argentina, Peru, and Spain, the same fate would befall Germany.”

    - Lords of Finance, by Liaquat Ahamed [2]


    “In the course of history, it is hard to argue the actions of one person can be so influential; most often, multiple factors are at play when anything happens in history. However, there is a case to be made, that at the heart of the origins of the German Constitutional Crisis was one man, Heinrich Brüning.

    Brüning is somewhat seen as the German equivalent to Herbert Hoover in America. He was a conservative with a staunch aversion to any policies he saw as ‘socialist’ in nature, which, while in a time of economic prosperity like only a year or two before would have been admirable and even preferable during a global depression, it was decidedly not. Initially, Brüning’s policies found some support given his financial and economic acumen. But it quickly melted away as the measures he instituted seemed to only accelerate the effects of the depression. Brüning’s policies were so unsuccessful that the Reichstag repealed them after a month. In response to this, Brüning attempted to have his policies pushed into action by way of ‘Notverordnung’, or emergency decree. This power, however, was vested only in the President himself, and after witnessing Brüning’s repeated failures decided to have him removed from the position of chancellor.

    Brünings cabinet didn’t even last a year yet it completely eroded faith in the government, and the economic downturn he caused only increased the radicalism and popularity of parties like the Nazis and DNVP. He left the Reichstag as a government practically at war with itself, many right-wing parties called for Jarres to dissolve the government and hold new elections. However, rightly fearing the rising popularity of the Nazis in reaction to Brüning's actions, Jarres refused and instead appointed the new Chancellor, Otto Wels a part of the SPD. At the time the SPD was still the largest party and yet had to nonetheless rule by a coalition in the Reichstag. Wels’ cabinet encompassed many of the SPD’s previous allies like the DDP, DVP, and Centre parties. However notably excluded the second-largest party in the Reichstag, the DNVP. The DNVP had undergone a very radical shift under its new chairman Alfred Hugenburg, a hardline defender of the Nazis. He had refused to support Brüning's cabinet, and Brüning's removal and public disgrace led him to believe that new elections would hail in the return of his party to prominence. He was especially displeased when Jarres refused to acquiesce and instead appointed a socialist to the chancellorship. Hugenburg expressed his discontent in a speech to the Reichstag only days after Wels’ appointment and stated his demands that the new elections be called or the DNVP would walk out on the government. Both Wels and Jarres attempted to negotiate with Hugenburg, but the DNVP refused to hear them out, finally not wanting to lose face by an entire party walking out on the Reichstag; Jarres caved and had the government dissolved and new elections called.

    It is disputed whether Hugenburg would have actually walked out had the new elections not been called. He could’ve still just as easily used the staunchness of Wels and Jarres as justification to initiate the crisis regardless. But the calling of new elections certainly made it easier for what came next.”

    - The Years of Anarchy: Germany from 1929-1932, by David Schmidt


    “Those autocrats in sheep's clothes who have for ten years ruled the Republic of Weimar, have pressed their boots on the neck of the German Volk for ten years too long! Today Germany will be reborn and take its rightful place among the great nations in the world!”

    - Excerpt from Alfred Hugenberg’s speech to the Reichstag, September 21st, 1930


    “On the morning of the 21st of September, 1930, the citizens of Berlin awoke to the sound of gunshots in the streets. Hours earlier, Alfred Hugenburg of the DNVP had called his party along with the armed paramilitary of ‘Der Stahlhelm’ and other groups of the nationalistic ‘Pan-German League’ to a rally, where he proclaimed to the gathered parties the results of the German federal elections that had been held a day prior. He announced the League had swept the elections but that the President was planning to suppress the results and remove them from the Reichstag. Thus, he called upon the League to pass a vote of impeachment against the President and take forcible hold of the German government. The German Constitutional Crisis had begun.

    The Pan-German Leagues paramilitary forces went on the warpath as they paraded through the streets of Berlin and marched up to the Reichstag, weapons in hand. Once there, the ministers of the ‘Neue Deutsche Regierung’ assembled in the Reichstag and held a trial in absentia with the unanimous decision to impeach President Karl Jarres. The new government then declared the acting chancellor, Alfred Hugenburg, to become the acting president and enact Article 48 of the constitution. The new government then announced the banning of ‘anti-German’ parties like the KPD and the Weimar Coalition and demanded the party headquarters be shut down. In some states, there was immediate compliance with the order, and party headquarters, especially in Pomerania, Ostprussia, and Bavaria, were shut down by the police. However, many did not comply, not least because of the limitations to Article 48 which Jarres' government and party had conveniently put in place only a short while prior.

    In the democratic stronghold of the Prussian Free State, the police not only did not comply with the order by the new government, but they immediately mobilized across the state to try and get the situation under control. It was specifically because the Prussian police defied the government's new orders that Karl Jarres was not beaten to death by a nationalist mob that arrived at his residence only a mere ten minutes after police had come to his home to inform him of the coup. However many others were not as lucky, and many politicians had their doors kicked in by the nationalist paramilitaries that day. The Prussian police acted quickly to save the President and by the time the Pan-German League had been informed Jarres was nowhere to be found, the German president was in Brandenburg, an hour from Berlin.

    Jarres was quick to action, one of the officers who had been escorting him out of Berlin said of the man, quote; “He was off like a shot from the moment he set foot to pavement.” Jarres, along with what ministers in his company had been rescued, sought out the nearest radio station from which they could broadcast to the German people. However, the Pan-German League had a force of paramilitaries in the city and the cabinet was forced to relocate to Magdeburg, which the German police had managed to lock down with the help of the local populace. From there, the cabinet went on air to declare the new government as illegitimate and unconstitutional, with the Minister-President of the Prussian free state, Otto Braun, alongside Jarres, bringing forward the actual results of the election, which had come in just before the crisis began. The SPD had won overwhelmingly in Prussia, and while the DNVP had won Pomerania, they had lost major battlegrounds in districts like Ostprussia to the NSDAP. The release of the electoral results from Prussia caused the New German Government's legitimacy to begin to crumble. Multiple other states began releasing their own electoral results, all of which clearly showed the DNVP and Pan-German League losing the election overwhelmingly. Even the KPD came to the side of Jarres’ government and called for a national strike against the government. With their authority up in the air, Hugenburg and the League panicked and declared martial law across the country, ordering the military to go in and clear out the revolutionaries. At the same time, Jarres was calling the German high command and ordering them to confine the troops to barracks and instead let the German police disperse the putsch. While many generals held Pan-German sympathies and were self-described nationalists, they nonetheless chose to obey the orders from Jarres rather than Hugenberg, this was largely because of the worry that supporting the failing Hugenberg regime could spark a nationwide communist revolution and lead to a civil war. With the coup by this point dissolving into street fights between the League's under-equipped militias and the well-trained Prussian police in Berlin, as well as the fears that Jarres could still mobilize the army, led to Hugenberg conceding to the results of the election and the new german government disarmed and surrendered at the gates of the Reichstag. The belief among Hugenberg and his supporters was that there was no way the Police would be able to arrest every single person associated with the plot and that they might be granted amnesty similar to the ringleaders of the Kapp Putsch around a decade prior. They quickly learned this would not be the case, and as Hugenberg stepped out of the Reichstag, he and his supporters were surrounded by the full force of the Prussian Police, and forcibly taken into custody.

    All in all, the two-day-long Constitutional Crisis of 1930 claimed the lives of some two hundred Germans on both sides. In its wake, the leaders of the attempted coup were sentenced to life imprisonment, with the exception of Hugenberg himself who was sentenced to death for high treason. The DNVP became defunct; its members were either arrested for their part in the crisis or left to help form the ‘Conservative People’s Party’ (KVP) [3], which would go on to officially replace the DNVP in almost all capacities. Protests and strikes, mostly by communists, persisted across Germany for another three weeks as the government tried to get itself under control, with new elections having to be called once again now that the DNVP as well as multiple other parties associated with the Pan-German League had either been dissolved or banned. The Crisis was extremely significant in the Weimar’s history, as while it would not be the last time civil discontent rose to a boiling point, nor the last time a group would attempt a putsch against the Weimar, it would be the last major revolt that had any chance of reshaping Germany. Although, in a way, it still did.”

    - Republic of Weimar, by Franklin McAdoo


    [1] I understand that this term may be considered offensive by some, and I apologize if that's how it is perceived. But I only intend here to show a level of historical accuracy. Sorry for the inconvenience.

    [2] Here I actually took out quite a few direct quotes and altered them slightly from the very real Liaquat Ahamed's also real book; Lords of Finance. The book is mostly about financiers who caused the economic breakdown in 1929, but since this is an alternate timeline, the Weimars tumult gets a larger mention, and the content is slightly altered. This is probably going to be the largest extent of the actual economics and finance stuff in my TL since I’m not great with that.

    [3] The KVP actually became a party in July of 1930 after moderate members of the DNVP broke with Hugenberg. That, of course, still happens, but they're much more prominent and don’t run out of funds by 1933.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 3: The Freie Stadt
  • Chapter 3: The Freie Stadt

    “There can be no doubt as to our next steps as a republic. If we wish to ensure safety, stability, and prosperity for our nation, we cannot stop anything short of the annihilation of the proponents of radicalism among us.”

    - Excerpt from German Chancellor, Otto Wels, national address to the German people shortly after his appointment, December 16th, 1930


    “Despite the fact that the NSDAP had not taken part in the coup attempt, they remained at the top of the hitlist for the Weimar government all throughout the next few years. The Nazis had managed to win all of Ostprussia and most of Pomerania in the recall elections, and their leader Adolf Hitler was already building his campaign for the 1932 presidential elections. They had inherited many of the votes of those sympathetic to the Pan-German League but had still lost significant popularity amongst the average Germans. Now acquainted with the nature of far-right politics, many did not want to vote the Nazis into power, given their own troubled history of putsch attempts.

    The Nazis themselves had to do damage control as a result of the Constitutional Crisis, with Hitler assuring the government his platform was strictly a legal institution and renouncing his past desires for armed insurrection. This created its own split in the party, as members of the SA who saw themselves as the vanguard of a ‘brownshirt revolution’ were disappointed by the party's new stance. Many would split off and join leaders like Walter Stennes’ ‘Nationalsozialistische Kampfbewegung Deutschlands’ (NSKD) which would be a very shortlived attempt as they quickly attracted the attention of the police and were shut down by the end of 1931. All the same, these actions damaged the Nazi's prestige immensely, and while they were licking their wounds and rebuilding their movement, the Weimar government was cracking down.

    Police would track and follow Nazi party leaders, and they would observe rallies carefully, often positioning themselves between the Nazis and their ‘targets’ such as Jewish neighborhoods. If they slipped up or did something illegal, there was the immediate promise of a swift crackdown. Why they did not necessarily enjoy following within the lines of the police of the Weimar republic, the SA and adjacent SS were left with little other choice than to show restraint. However that could only last for so long, and while many had expected violence to explode between the Nazis and the government forces in Berlin, Merseburg, or Dusseldorf. No one had expected that the catalyst for the Nazi's fall would come from tiny Danzig.”

    - The Brown & The Red: Fascism and Communism in Germany in the 20th Century, by Toni Greene


    “I still remember my 29th birthday vividly. I had taken my time walking to the post office that morning, the same as every day before then. I knew that Jan would probably give me hell for it, but it was my birthday after all. I hadn’t assumed anything could happen on that day. I had been so terribly wrong, I was sitting at a cafe by the Motława when we heard the boom. I and everyone else on the street turned and looked to the location of the noise, just in time to see fire and smoke rising from the Senate Building. I heard women gasp and children cry, people began sprinting to the location in panic. I, too, had thought that perhaps it was the mail station that had gone up in smoke. When we all arrived, there was barely anything left of the building where our legislature once was. Outside were scores of police officers, standing alongside them members of the Danzig SS. No one bothered to question why they were standing outside the government building, or how they’d gotten there so quickly. All of us knew the truth.”

    - A Postman’s Journal, by Alfons Flisykowski


    “Danzig was perhaps the perfect encapsulation of German radicalism and its driving factors. Danzig’s ‘free state’ solution was a compromise forced upon a war-weary and above all, sour population. The supposed ‘free state’ ultimately existed at the whim of Warsaw which also decided its tariffs and held the entire city’s economic prosperity in the palm of its hand. As a result, the economic hardship that catapulted the city and its benefactor into extreme hardship became seen as foreign blunders that ordinary Germans would have to pay the cost of. So it was no surprise that its 90% majority German population became extremely susceptible to radical politics.

    In 1930, Manfredi Gravina, the High Commissioner, and a devoted fascist swore in a senate made up of multiple NSDAP members, replacing the former mixed cabinet with one made up in almost its entirety of conservatives, both far-right and moderate. The Senate became quickly embroiled in a dispute over electing a President of the Senate. Moderates wanted candidates from the Zentrum party Gustav Fuchs, while the far-right parties like the NSDAP nominated the former SS-Gauleiter of Danzig Arthur Greiser. Eventually, both came to a compromise with former conservative Hermann Rauschning, who had a close relationship with the Nazi party but was also a well-spoken conservative. However, Rauschning clashed with the Gauleiter Albert Forster. Forster was close with the mandarins of the Nazi party and was an ambitious young man with a desire to aggressively ‘take the bull by the horns’. Forster had been hoping for a more nationalist-oriented senate in his favor with the absorption of the vacant Volkstag positions of the DNVP with fresh Nazi party members and was frustrated with the significant presence and influence of the Centre party in the Senate.

    On multiple occasions, both the Senate and President would obstruct Forster's party and Volkstag's advancement, and he was repeatedly also obstructed from taking hold of the irridentist German organizations in the wider Polish corridor area. Forster's frustrations with the government finally fomented into open hostility, when Forster openly referred to the senate as ‘a gaggle of national traitors’. Shortly after this confrontation with the senate members, Forster held a correspondence with his close ally, Rudolf Hess. According to Forster, Hess at the meeting told him; ‘whatever you do, Hitler will be behind you.’ essentially giving the Gauleiter, in his mind at least, free reign in his actions. So on September 22nd, 1931, a bomb went off in the Senate Building of Danzig, killing the entire senate, and the Danzig SA mobilized to take hold of the entire city.”

    - G-DANZ-IK [1]: The Free City, by Samuel Beck


    [1] A play on the German name Danzig and Polish name Gdańsk.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 4: Trial of Fire
  • Chapter 4: Trial of Fire

    “The split fomenting between the ideologically-motivated SA and Hitler's party-oriented SS has often sparked a conversation among 20th-century historians on if such a split may have ever divided the party between and what it may have resulted in.

    The SS was undyingly loyal to Hitler and answered almost inclusively to him. By 1931, they were already replacing the SA in most official capacities, which is part of what led to friction between the groups. The SS was not only far more loyal but a more refined force as well, meant for security rather than attacks, and was a move away from the brutish and insurrectionist tactics of the SA.

    The SA, on the other hand, desired to be the party vanguard. An army that would supersede every other military organization in Germany and form a Napoleonic-style people's army or a levy-en-masse. While any such scenario would be purely hypothetical, as the Nazi party would collapse after 1931, the best evidence as to the hypothetical success of such an SA levy-military would best be illustrated by the events in Danzig, that sealed their party’s collapse.”

    - The Brown & The Red: Fascism and Communism in Germany in the 20th Century, by Toni Greene


    “Word traveled fast of the events in Danzig. Two hours after the bombing had taken place, and subsequent martial law had been established by the Volkstag, the Polish army was mobilizing in the territory outside of the free city.

    Inside Danzig itself, the SA was now patrolling the streets alongside the police. Until the ‘perpetrators’ had been found there would be martial law in the city. However, the acting President of the provisional senate assured the leader of Poland, that they would be able to get things under control. However, despite the tense atmosphere surrounding Danzig, neither side had a massive aversion to open hostilities. They were not thrilled at the prospect of a battle and subsequent loss of life and probably loss of face, but there was not the same danger surrounding fighting in Danzig that was presented by the Rhineland or Dalmatian coast, the invasions of which could easily spiral into a new great war.

    From the perspective of Polish commanders, if they won they had ample excuse to dissolve the city and annex it at last with little trouble. If they somehow lost, they’d just regather strength and attack again later, they had replenishable equipment and manpower, but the SA did not. On the SA side, they were absolutely hoping for a fight, even knowing they would, without a doubt, lose. Forster only cared about a glorious propaganda victory, and he based his strategy almost entirely on Gabriele D'Annunzio’s regency in Fiume. He envisioned himself and the Danzig SA returning to Germany with a hero’s welcome, having killed thousands of Polish troops in a defiant defense, something that would catapult the NSDAP to victory. In short, a fight was absolutely imminent in Danzig, which contributed to a sense of almost calm acceptance of the current situation there.

    The NSDAP back in Germany on the other hand, was in a state of complete hysteria. While Hess had promised Forster an effective ‘blank cheque’ with Hitler’s stamp of approval. Hitler, on the other hand, had not written off on this. He had not heard a single word of what Forster was planning, as the Gauleiter had neglected to alert the party officials of his plan once it was set into motion. This meant when a bomb went off in Danzig, and the SA suddenly seized control of the entire city, the Nazis had to drop everything they were doing and conduct damage control. This mostly consisted of a raging Hitler attempting to get in touch with Forster who had very conveniently cut most of the radio lines into Danzig, as well as the Nazis trying to shut down their own rallies as nationalists and pro-Forster Nazis came out into the streets waving swastikas in support of the takeover, which was extremely concerning as it could lead to the Weimar taking action under the assumption that Hitler actually had sponsored the putsch. Hitler didn’t need to worry about the government coming down on them immediately, as, of all the groups who had something to gain or lose during the Danzig putsch, it was the Weimar who would gain the most out of the ordeal.”

    - Republic of Weimar, by Franklin McAdoo


    “Danzig was everything that the Weimar government could’ve possibly required at that exact moment. The Reich government had been floating the idea for over a year of putting out an arrest warrant for Hitler, he had a long list already of unconstitutional acts that warranted such a response but had blocked the Prussian Free State police from carrying it out. The Nazis were, at this point, still endeared to the population, and attempting to forcibly disband them could invoke resistance and give the appearance that the government was losing its grip and becoming paranoid. They needed ample justification for them to swoop in and mop up the Nazis. Thanks to Forster, they now had one. All they had to do was wait for something to give.

    Both the President and his cabinet knew without a shadow of a doubt that Forster would come to one of two conclusions. He would either claim Danzig for Germany, again taking a page from D’Annunzio’s book, or he would attempt to spark a conflict in the corridor with Polish forces. If he did either of these things, the Weimar could mobilize against him and step in to restore order in Danzig. So sure enough when Forster's address to the city came through on the radio, declaring Danzig once again in the hands of Germans, the army was given the green light and marched right over the border. It was a shock to the SA in Danzig when the German Reichswehr marched in not with the intent to aid them, but to disarm and arrest them. Firefights quickly broke out between the SA and the Army, with the battle lasting just over three hours. When the news finally came through that Forster had been apprehended, the Prussian police issued an arrest warrant for the ‘masterminds’ behind the Danzig putsch, the Nazi party had now been outlawed.”

    - The Years of Anarchy: Germany from 1929-1932, by David Schmidt
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 5: March of the Brownshirts
  • Chapter 5: March of the Brownshirts

    “Hitler’s arrest was the most publicized event in German history to this day. You can still cheaply purchase century-old newspapers from the era reporting on the day it happened because of how many copies had been printed. The quickest rising nationalist in Germany had practically overnight gone tumbling down. The charges levied against him by the government included multiple ‘unconstitutional acts’ namely the inciting of political violence by way of the SA.

    Hitler would have very easily been able to worm his way out of these charges, however. In later memoirs he would lament his sentence as being avoidable. He could absolutely prove he had no part in the putsch in Danzig, and his past crimes in which the SA played a large role could be definitely hand-waved if he could provide evidence of the benefit they’d brought to German public security.

    That isn’t to say Hitler would have escaped prison. Even without the events that followed his arrest, the SA was still an organization responsible for extreme use of violence and civil disruption and would’ve likely been disbanded regardless, along with the Nazi party even had they not responded the way they did. However, Hitler could’ve still easily reorganized the Nazis under a different name, just as they had before, their operations would have been damaged, but not irreparable had the SA simply complied with their leader's arrest. But as we know, they did not.

    - Republic of Weimar, by Franklin McAdoo


    “The SA was in shock when the Police showed up at the Gau headquarters in Berlin to arrest Hitler and several other Nazis. Many were still hopped up on the high provided by Forster's attempted putsch in Danzig. They reportedly attempted to heckle the Police officers arresting Hitler, only managing to succeed in breaking their own noses and a near-brawl in the middle of the street. But the seeds of discontent were already being sown. Some of the SA leadership decided to wait out the storm. See if Hitler would have any orders for them when or if he released a statement. However for a large portion of them. They chose not to wait at all.

    Christian Weber was among those who attempted to rile up the SA after Hitler's arrest. Weber was a notorious Nazi, and despite having Hitler’s ear, was especially known for his personal corruption and desire for self-enrichment. Weber was one of the few left after the arrests were carried out, with most of the Nazi's heads, like Himmler, Hitler, Goebbels, and Rohm, all thrown in jail. Without waiting for a go-ahead and against the advice of his colleagues, Weber threw an impromptu rally in the middle of Berlin and demanded that the SA and SS mobilize a putsch to overthrow the supposedly corrupt government. While Weber would later defend himself as a ‘proud Hitlerite’ nowhere in his original speech, which was recorded by a sympathetic director whom he had paid off, did he advocate for his leader's release instead of stressing the time for a revolution against the Weimar.

    Weber, a member of the old guard of the party, was successful in recreating the Beer Hall Putsch in which he had participated almost a decade prior. He gained support quickly in Berlin. The SA in Berlin quickly converged on the police station there. At 5:00 PM shots were heard being exchanged between the police and SA. By 7:00 PM, Article 48 had been enacted by the Reichstag. By 8:00 PM, shooting was echoing in the streets.”

    - The Years of Anarchy: Germany from 1929-1932, by David Schmidt


    Ҥ1 In the event of a State not fulfilling the obligations imposed upon it by the Reich Constitution or by the laws of the Reich, the president of the Reich may make use of the state police to compel it to do so.
    §2 If public security and order are seriously disturbed or endangered within the German Reich (defined in Paragraph 5), the president of the Reich may take measures necessary for their restoration, intervening if need be with the assistance of the armed forces. For this purpose, he may suspend for a pre-determined period, in part, the fundamental rights provided in Articles 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153. The period may be re-approved by the Reichstag if public order has not been restored by that point.
    §3 The president of the Reich must first inform the Reichstag without delay before any and all measures are to be taken in accordance with Paragraphs 1 or 2 of this Article. These measures are to be revoked on the demand of the Reichstag.
    §4 If the same conditions as presented in Paragraph 2 are present, a State government may, for its own territory, take temporary measures as provided in Paragraph 2. These measures are to be revoked on the demand of the president of the Reich or of the Reichstag.
    §5 Endangerment or disruption of public security and order is defined as acts that willingly violate the current laws of the Reich, especially laws pertaining to the use of political violence or violence of a political nature, thereby waiving the rights listed in Articles 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153. [1]

    - The amended version of Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution, amended June 5th, 1928


    “Many historians make out the ‘March of the Brownshirts’ as the true final putsch of early Weimar history. In an almost worryingly heroic-sounding story of the woefully out-matched SA attempting to take on the colossal giant that was Weimar Germany. Some go as far as to call out the Weimar government for its use of Article 48, despite making significant moves to have it reduced and, in the case of the SPD, outright removed only years prior. These founding myths of the far-right are not only argumentative fallacies, but historical ones as well.

    The SA was not necessarily outmatched; there were hundreds of them in Berlin during the putsch, and their numbers, compared to that of the police, proved a sizeable threat. However, the march was not some glorious last stand for the SA, it was more like a dying gasp of breath for the whole movement. The SA had barely any guns between them and were woefully underprepared to take on the Police in Berlin, who were not only better trained, more experienced, and better armed. But also had predicted the SA response would not be one of calm moderation and had begun preparing for a violent civil disruption hours before the putsch happened, even warning nearby neighborhoods to vacate the area in fear of them getting caught in the crossfire. Even then, many would still die at the hands of the SA.

    When the march began at around 5:00 in the afternoon, with the sun setting, the German police were out in droves at barricades and as soon as it became clear the SA intended violent action, shooting erupted. The president was not long after contacted by the chief of police who informed him of the violence in the streets. At this point, it is also important to note another myth perpetrated by the far-right of Germany. Which is that President Jarres had planned to lure the SA with Hitler's arrest as bait. While it is true Jarres intentionally did not suppress the Nazi demonstrations earlier in the day during Forster's putsch in Danzig, it is simply untrue that he needlessly continued to put lives on the line after the arrests had been carried out. Jarres was still a German chauvinist, and he belonged to a conservative party, the DVP. While they had distanced themselves from hardline nationalism, Jarres was a far cry from an anti-Nazi. He still thought that the SA would simply stand down after their leadership collapsed, and that miscalculation would still cost him the next election. For the time being, however, it gave ample reason for the Reichstag to support Article 48 being put into action.

    Article 48, even after being amended by the Reichstag in 1928, was a controversial law. It presented the potential to be harmful to German democracy and, even in its revised state, created friction, most especially between the police and armed forces. The ‘NDR’ had attempted to put the old law back in place during the Constitutional Crisis, which is what actually led to the Armed Forces disobeying the order, and likely saving the German government from collapse. There is a case to be made that Article 48 would also unknowingly save the German government during the March of the Brownshirts; however, once again, this relies upon the narrative that the Brownshirts had any real chance of overthrowing the German government. There were firefights between them and the police, yes, and sporadic shootouts persisted until the morning. But the SA never had a chance against a well-prepared and cohesive force. The ‘March of the Brownshirts’ by the time it ended sometime around 7:00 in the morning on September 23rd, would only succeed in ensuring the end of the Nazi party.”

    - The Brown & The Red: Fascism and Communism in Germany in the 20th Century, by Toni Greene


    [1] Again, like with the economy thing from earlier chapters, I am REALLY bad with legal lingo. If anyone has better knowledge on this and could help edit, I’d be open to that, but the basics are just that the law is no longer as broadly sweeping in use, nor as centered around the president, nor does it give power to the Armed Forces but, instead to the Weimar police.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 6: Long Live the Weimar Republic
  • Chapter 6: Long Live the Weimar Republic

    “The ‘Republik von Weimar’ or alternatively ‘Weimarer Republik’ was a term first coined in reference to the German Republic by Adolf Hitler at a speech in Münich in February of 1929. It was not necessarily an instant classic; at that point, the NSDAP had still yet to reach its peak in popularity. But it caught on soon enough.

    Every party in Germany came to use their own terminology when referencing the Republic. The National Assembly, who had first declared the Republic all the way back in 1919, had it referred to as ‘Deutsches Reich’ in the first article of the new constitution. The term ‘Reich’ became widely used by many on the conservative right, with the exception of the Centre party, who often referred to it as ‘Deutscher Volksstaat’ or the ‘German People’s State’. Finally, the SPD, the most dominant party in Germany by far often called it ‘Deutsche Republik’ or the German Republic, which continues to be used quite often today. However, arguably the most popular term for Germany has been that of the ‘Weimar Republic,’ a term that, from its inception, was dripping with vitriol for its very subject. It has since then become a clever play on dialogue in the toolbox of every major German political party along the far right. From the contemporary DNVP to more modern examples like the ‘Nationalsozialistische Aktionsfront Deutschlands’ (NSAD).

    The name denoted a belief promoted by many on the German far-right, and one especially popular amongst your average German during the difficult times of the Great Depression. That the Republic had been declared and born not of popular revolt but instead had come to be as a result of a punishment imposed upon the German people. Decided on by a group of bureaucrats and bourgeois intellectuals in a smoky room in a city far from the centers of government administration in Berlin. To the German people, the term ‘Weimar Republic’ was meant to represent every hardship they had been subject to in the last decade.

    So it’s remarkable, then, that a term such as ‘Weimar Republic’, which was intended so clearly to be a slap in the face to the Republic and its constitution, did not become shunned by the mainstream parties but instead adopted and worn as a badge of honor by Germany's democratic proponents.”

    - The Etymology of Weimar, Franklin McAdoo, University of St Andrews


    “Today, we cast off the failures of bygone eras, and we will walk into a brighter future for all of Germany; long live the Weimar Republic!”

    - Excerpt from the inauguration speech of German President Otto Braun, August 3rd, 1932


    “The post office was a mess by the end of the battle. I still remember coming out after all the shootings had stopped. A group of soldiers escorted many of us down the road, still fearful of Nazi retaliatory strikes. But if the rats were waiting for us, hiding in the gutters, then we never saw snout nor tail of them.

    When I arrived at the post office I thought my coworkers and Jan especially would be at least somewhat confused or upset as to where I was on my own birthday. There were plates out, and a cake half-eaten on the table when I walked in. But rather than bombard me with questions my friends gathered around and hugged me tightly. Jan must’ve thanked the soldiers with me about a hundred times before he was satisfied and we sat down for cake. They’d gone out and bought gifts for me too. I got new socks and a photograph of us in our first group photo in front of the building in an exquisite frame; Jan had even gone through the trouble of procuring a new suit for me. I was simply glad that my friends were still alive after that mess. But the best birthday gift wasn’t the physical gifts they gave me.

    No, the best gift was when we had settled down with our festivities, and came to the realization of just how ransacked the post office had become. The Nazis had tossed firebombs, rocks, and all manner of garbage through windows, and graffitied walls. From what Jan said, a couple of them had taken upon themselves the challenge of attempting to shoot a roosted Pidgeon somewhere near the top floor and had riddled the side with bullets in the process when some genius had decided to try using the machine gun they’d brought with them. But as we began winding down our celebration of life, and began attempting to clean up around the place, one of the men with me earlier tapped me on the shoulder. He tried to communicate in extremely botched Polish, which I couldn’t understand at all, but after a few minutes of trying to explain, he simply set his gun down and snatched up a broom from the corner. Then his friend did the same, none of us quite knew what to make of it at first. So we didn’t say anything, and we all got to work tidying up the post office. Then more soldiers passed by, and the two helping us barked something at them in German, they dashed off and returned with an extremely important-looking officer. The two soldiers saluted the man as he approached, he was a hard-looking old fellow, with eyes chiseled out of stainless steel. He scanned us for a good long while, gave the building a once-over, turned on his heel, and marched back down the road. Ten minutes later, he returned with some soldiers and a few civilians, most of them poles who could speak German. They came with panes of glass, and buckets of paint, one of the men walked right up to us, smiled, and asked,

    “May we help?”

    Of course, we said yes. When we had finished, one of the Germans ran to the top floor of the building and hoisted the Danzig flag. We cheered him from below. One of the soldiers was a photographer in his free time, we took one together in front of the post office, all of us posing like we were in some kind of special unit or battalion. The post office battalion. The very next day, I went down to the store and bought myself another picture frame. It has sat on my desk for the last 19 years.”

    - A Postman’s Journal, by Alfons Flisykowski


    “In contrast with the events of its past twelve years of existence, the rest of the 1930s were perhaps the closest thing to a second gilded era for Weimar Germany. The trial of the ultranationalists was quickly settled in court, and each and every one of them was given very lengthy sentences. Despite Hitler's attempts, and an albeit extremely credible defense, the court still sentenced him to ten years of jail time and dissolved his party and paramilitary force.

    Danzig was far more of a tough pill to swallow. While the population was extremely happy to see German troops in its streets, they were not to stay there for very long. The risk the government had taken by moving troops into a neutral country, against the wills of the neighboring poles, for the purpose of shutting down Forster and his putsch was an extremely calculated one. It was thus always the intention of Jarres’ government to, in the end, withdraw from the territory. Though many, especially the German population, were sad to see them go. The military high command in charge of the operations in Danzig was especially displeased, both German and Polish, and over the next five years, Poland would sponsor a migration of ethnic Poles to the area to prevent a similar situation from ever again developing. This arguably would continue to create tensions in the area, but these concerns would largely be swept away during the 1940s, and while there was still a significant shift to the conservative parties, with the main nationalist parties rounded up, there was little else to be done.

    Then things came to the German government itself. Though they had successfully survived the ordeal, Jarres would not be recognized for many of his accomplishments. In fact, many more liberal Germans at the time would see him as a spark that almost burned down the Republic. On the other hand, conservatives saw Jarres as both too close to the left and center, as well as not as willing to uphold the principles of liberal democracy. The death of Gustav Streseman just 3 years earlier also accelerated his party’s waning popularity crisis. As a result, Jarres would overwhelmingly lose the presidential election of 1932, vacating his position to Otto Braun of the SPD.

    Brauns next 7 years in office would be marked by an era of quiet times for the average German. A steady recovery after the Depression and a policy of disinvolvement in greater European politics. Germany, for the next few years, would face inward, step back, and enjoy an era of blissful peace. It wasn't quite the Golden Era of the Republic like in the 20s, and there were many not-insignificant shifts in German politics. Such as, for example, the shift of the German Centre Party to the much more conservative right under Franz von Papen. However, from the end of the depression to the beginning of the 1940s, Germany would regain its footing, rebuild, and restructure, and when eventually the time did come, and the Republic would again be tested by its enemies, this time they would be ready.”

    - The Years of Anarchy: Germany from 1929-1932, by David Schmidt
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 7: The Match Struck New
  • Chapter 7: The Match Struck

    “The early years of the Fascist government of the Italian Empire were marked by the widespread suppression and assassinations of leaders of the Italian left-wing, such as Giacomo Matteotti. Over the course of their dominance in the Italian parliament, the fascists forced out other parties and elected officials, replacing them with appointed positions subservient to Mussolini. By the 1930s Italy was a fully autocratized state, rife with militant nationalism and a fervent hatred of liberal democracy and communism alike.

    So it came as somewhat of a surprise on September 2nd, 1933, when the Italian ‘Duce’ Benito Mussolini, met in Moscow with the General Secretary of the Communist Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin, and between them signed the ‘Pact of Friendship, Neutrality, and Nonaggression between Italy and the Soviet Union’. Internally, the respective authoritarians were able to largely hand-wave the treaty under their own pretenses, be it the greater threat of the Bourgeois democracies or the socialist origins of the Fascist movement itself. However, from the outside, the two totalitarian powers of Europe signing an alliance was not only confusing but incredibly worrisome.

    Mussolini had been espousing irridentist rhetoric since before his rise to power and continued to eye the much-desired Dalmatian coast. Stalin likewise expressed a desire to reclaim lost land from the civil war, especially in neighboring Poland, with whom it still had a score to settle. Together, the two could and would very easily dismantle the entire system that had kept Europe at peace for the last decade.

    Britain and France especially feared the Communists who had been European pariahs since even well before their rise in the 1920s. However, it was still believed that the differences between Italy and the Soviets would eventually prove too great and the alliance would break apart over time. They would be proven terribly incorrect.”

    - The Spectres, by Michelle Boyd


    “Erich Ludendorff was once one of the most revered and respected figures in Germany. He had led the German army in numerous victories across the Western front. Though, as fate would have it, seeking the same credit as his partner, Hindenburg, he would instead receive the blame for Germany’s failures in the closing hours of the war. He was removed from his position, and suffering from a cantankerous attitude brought on by 5 years of battle fatigue, Ludendorff withdrew from public life.

    Perhaps as a result of feeling wrongfully blamed for German failures, perhaps because he had no other scapegoat than the missing Kaiser, Ludendorff became a founding espouser of what the Germans called ‘Dolchstosslegende’, or ‘Stab-in-the-Back Myth’. The failures of the war that shattered Germany as they had known it was no longer the fault of an extremely erratic general, but instead of the Jews, the Communists, and the Republicans. Ludendorff very quickly became a figure for the German far-right and was openly supportive of numerous attempts to overthrow the Republic. From the Kapp Putsch in 1920, to the German Constitutional Crisis in 1930. Ironically after that last attempt at revolution, the German general would be forced to leave the country altogether, to never again return home.

    However, unlike many of his compatriots, who sought refuge in Austria or Italy, Ludendorff and many of those loyal and associated with him, would flee to the unlikely nation of the Empire of Japan. There, the retired general would publish his most divisive and nationalistic work, ‘Der totale Krieg’. This book, which would be banned in Germany shortly after its publishing, became extremely popular in Japan, especially among the developing far-right cliques within the military and officer corps of the empire. Ludendorff, for the next seven years of his life, would travel across Japan, meeting with extremists in the Japanese military. Including Kanji Ishiwara, Seishirō Itagaki, and Tetsuzan Nagata, all of whom would become the ringleaders of the Mukden Incident, which would ignite the burning fire of militarism in Japan. A force that, given time, would eventually burn its own nation to the ground.”

    - The Death of Japanese Democracy, by Katayama Goro


    “The Italo-Soviet Axis, as it would eventually come to be known, got off to an extremely rocky start. The Italians and Soviets would repeatedly end up on opposite ends of conflicts. The Soviets would openly oppose the Italian conquest in the Horn of Africa, and when Spain exploded into civil war in 1936, the two supported opposite sides, with the Italians ‘Corpo Truppe Volontarie’ forming to support the Nationalists, and thousands of Soviet men joined the international brigades to fight for the Republicans. The civil war especially became a massive sore spot for the alliance, and during the course of the war, it seemed to the rest of Europe that the two came to the closest they ever were of breaking off their detente.

    However, despite outward appearances, throughout the 1930s, Italo-Soviet cooperation only deepened further. The Italians sent hundreds of planes and bombs which the Soviets would weaponize against the Basmachi rebels in Central Asia and the population of Xinjiang. When Italy invaded Ethiopia, the Soviets publicly decried the move yet continued to trade secretly with the Italians and even supplied Soviet helmets to their army. Even during the height of tensions, the Soviets and Italians maintained a correspondence and the Italian volunteers outright tried to avoid battles with Soviet brigades. Soviet captains of the Red Fleet even met with Mussolini, who graciously received and treated the Soviets to a lunch in Naples.

    But the Great Powers of Britain and France, continued to anticipate a looming breakup between the Italo-Soviet pact. Chief among them was Neville Chamberlain, the British prime minister, who in popular history is often regarded as approaching the entire situation without any sort of prudence, ignoring the rising tensions until they finally could not be ignored. Many forget, however, that Chamberlain consistently tried to break up the alliance in a number of ways, attempting to play into Mussolini's anti-communism and appealing to his virulent irridentism with offers of land. In other ways too, the British and French did make real and tangible efforts to defang the Axis before it rose to prominence and enforce their ‘peace in Europe’. All efforts that we know with hindsight failed. And there was no more spectacular of a failure of this peace than on April 26th, 1939, during the events that would eventually become known as the Little War.”

    - The Spectres, by Michelle Boyd


    “The aftermath of the Mukden Incident of 1931, and Japan's subsequent invasion and occupation of Manchuria were marked by a massive rise of Japanese militarism. The 10,000-strong occupational force directly disobeyed the Japanese government and even the orders of the Emperor himself, refusing to stand down. Despite the Japanese government complying as best they could with the League of Nations and the Chinese government led by the ‘Guómíndǎng’ (KMT), the ministers of government were faced with the difficult truth that they had lost credibility and control of their military force. Quickly, the public fell into hysteria and war fever, which was exacerbated and exploited by reactionaries across Japan. Prolific speakers, sometimes non-Japanese, such as Erich Ludendorff or Werner von Blomberg, voiced their complaints of the complacency and pacifism of weak constitutional governments and their belief that Japan was destined to overthrow these shambling governments and establish a pure military government.

    The situation deteriorated quickly, and on the night of the 15th of May in 1932, a group of officers stormed the residence of the Japanese prime minister and murdered him. It would be the first of many politically-motivated assassinations. The trial meant to shun and condemn the murderers became a soap box upon which they were able to stand and voice their criticisms to all of Japan. In the years following a series of more political murders and attempts at intimidation would arise. The nationalist groups at play in Japan, most importantly the radical ‘Kōdōha’ and the more moderate but still extremist ‘Tōseiha’, fought not only against the constitutional government but with one another as well. The ‘Kōdōha’ despised modernity and wished to wage a national war against the corrupting ideologies of Bolshevism and the West. Meanwhile, the ‘Tōseiha’ wished to make use of Western modernization as a weapon to improve Japan under the plans of ‘Total Mobilization’ to claim dominance over all of Asia. These two groups grew in size and strength throughout their campaign of terror in Japan and made use of what common ground united their movement to, in turn, divide Japan against itself and force the change they wished to see. Despite this, the 1936 general elections were a major defeat for them, with the pacifistic and constitutional government being upheld by the democratic process, and yet all that was about to change.

    On the 26th of February, 1936. Young officers of the Kōdōha faction again tried to commit to a violent overthrow of the government. Calling themselves; ‘The Righteous Army’ led by Jinzaburō Mazaki, occupied key government areas and murdered multiple government ministers, demanding the formation of a military cabinet centered around Mazaki. The ‘Supreme Military Council’ (SMC) issued an official response, one heavily influenced by the Kōdōha minister of war; Sadao Araki. The public recognition of the movement led to another uproar of support for the nationalists among pro-Kōdōha units, especially in the Japanese client states and occupied nations like Korea and Manchuria, whose garrisons mutinied in support of the rebels. Meanwhile, the emperor and his cabinet sat on the verge of a war. The court ministers and the Emperor himself were in agreement that they could absolutely not tolerate the actions of the Kōdōha any longer but were in no position to shut them down. A stalemate settled in over that afternoon, with an air of tension settling like smog over Tokyo. As evening settled, the tension would finally snap with the sound of gunshots in the street. In response to the rebels' actions, those loyal to the Tōseiha attempted to shut down any neutral or non-acting parties of the Kōdōha that were on the fence, the ruthless Kempeitai, under the orders of Hideki Tojo, a prominent Tōseiha supporter, they arrested and executed hundreds of officers. In response, and as all negotiations broke down, fighting exploded in the streets, ignoring calls from the government to cease; the military moved in and occupied the city. With the Tōseiha largely seizing control of the parliament and court cabinet. As night fell, ferocious fires rose like pillars over cities all across the Japanese Empire. The Japanese Civil War had officially begun.”

    - Fires in the East: East Asias Civil Wars 1936-1954, by Allen Burnes

    I HAVE RETURNED! Sorry for the delay on this chapter. I've been in crunch time for my tests in school, so I haven't been able to write much. Updates will still be slow, and I'm also working a lot on my other TL, "Kingdom of Kowloon," so this has taken a bit of a backseat lately. Worry not; I'm still working on it, and Chapter 8 is already in the works! Thank you all so so much for your support for this TL so far! I hope to deliver more chapters soon!
     
    Last edited:
    Top