Why build a separate glider for tanks when you have this:
Antonov A-40 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The first US rear door Transport was the RB-1 Budd Conestoga of 1943Tallboys were accurate (for dumb iron) , rolling something out of a ww2 transport not so much ( I'm also dubious it could handle the shift in weight and it was a nose loader I believe, like the British Horsa glider)
Probably tactically better for the Heer as they have better models of the Pz III and IV as well as better assault guns. Strategically Stalingrad is still going to be a disaster.An invasion of Malta with Allied aerial and naval superiority using literal meme machines that's what people think of when they mention "Nazi super weapons." A totally rational decision from the Nazi leadership indeed.
Jokes aside, is the situation on the Eastern Front any different or just the same as OTL?
Unless they decide to simply, [looks carefully over my should as the following words may attract a certain someone], encircle the city, at least on three sides, Ideally four and lay siege to the city ala Lenningrad, without entering, then I honestly don't see any other outcome.Probably tactically better for the Heer as they have better models of the Pz III and IV as well as better assault guns. Strategically Stalingrad is still going to be a disaster.
If they do it on three sides, they don't really siege it. Even then it will most likely end badly for them.Unless they decide to simply, [looks carefully over my should as the following words may attract a certain someone], encircle the city, at least on three sides, Ideally four and lay siege to the city ala Lenningrad, without entering, then I honestly don't see any other outcome.
As you are offering us strategic “master strokes“ from both IJA and IJN at the same time! Take all the time you need, this looks like it’s going to be fun…A bit late with the update to day as it is a public holiday in the UK and I was out for the evening.
Well both the IJN and the IJA are competing with one another to deliver the victory that will force the British, the Americans, or both to accept Japan's dominance in South East Asia and neither is willing to accept that its a hopeless fantasy.As you are offering us strategic “master strokes“ from both IJA and IJN at the same time! Take all the time you need, this looks like it’s going to be fun…
The Japanese problem is magnified by Victory Disease and some early successes, winning the war seems almost within their grasp, if you ignore, economics, logisitics and the sheer determination of the USA in particular to crush them.Well, the Japanese saw Italy getting throughly humiliated, so they decided that they were jealous and wanted some humiliation of their own...
I don't where you would get that idea...It's almost as if neither the Japanese nor the German top command were entirely rational and objective in their assessments.
I can't see this. Pearl Harbor was brilliant, but it was a hit-and-run raid. It wasn't evidence of Japanese forces engaging and destroying their adversaries in strength. After all, anybody can be caught off guard. OTL Singapore, by contrast, was such evidence. That was where Japan contracted "victory disease". The Japanese were already seriously overconfident - but Singapore confirmed that attitude. Followed, of course, by Java Sea, Burma, and Philippines. And the Indian Ocean raid (the British ran away). ITTL none of that happened.After the astonishing success of the Japanese attacks launched on December 7th there was a sense that Japan was unstoppable and fated to win...
I was including Hong Kong and the Philippines in their run of successes that began on the 7th.I can't see this. Pearl Harbor was brilliant, but it was a hit-and-run raid. It wasn't evidence of Japanese forces engaging and destroying their adversaries in strength. After all, anybody can be caught off guard. OTL Singapore, by contrast, was such evidence. That was where Japan contracted "victory disease". The Japanese were already seriously overconfident - but Singapore confirmed that attitude. Followed, of course, by Java Sea, Burma, and Philippines. And the Indian Ocean raid (the British ran away). ITTL none of that happened.
I'm not denying the Japanese could still be so overconfident ITTL they would attempt the outlined plan; but not because of Pearl Harbor.
Americans were still holding out in the Philippines into April 1941 in the original timeline (at Corregidor) but I guess they may have collapsed faster in this timeline.I was including Hong Kong and the Philippines in their run of successes that began on the 7th.
Not really, more that the initial American collapse played into the Japanese belief in their own inevitable victory and places like Malaya and Wake Island that contradict that belief are seen as mere bumps in the road. Whether that is actually arrogance or a form of denial is something I will leave to the reader.Americans were still holding out in the Philippines into April 1941 in the original timeline (at Corregidor) but I guess they may have collapsed faster in this timeline.