Into the Cincoverse - The Cinco de Mayo EU Thread and Wikibox Repository

2016 FIFA World Cup - Knockouts
Round of 16

The hosts welcomed the United States to the Parc des Princes, where they easily dispatched a quickly and clearly overwhelmed American side 2-0, scoring both goals before the 40th minute and then leisurely parking the bus for the remainder of the match. Group A's runner-up in Australia, for its own part, put on a clinic in Saint-Etienne, demolishing Hungary by a 4-1 scoreline aided by a Chris Wood brace that was nowhere near as close as the result would otherwise indicate, shockingly putting an end to what had otherwise been a budding hope of a decent run by long-suffering Mighty Magyar supporters.

Paraguay had looked, potentially, like the best South American team in France in its group stage, defeating Spain and topping its group after a fine performance in a 1-0 loss to a desperate Portugal; Argentina, meanwhile, looked to be punching below her weight in a World Cup yet again. But on a balmy, humid night in Bordeaux, these longstanding South American rivals fought to a draw in regular time, in part due to Gonzalo Higuain's penalty at 72' going off the sidebar, and though Albiceleste supporters were then convinced that the heartbreak endured every four years since 1988 was striking yet again, Argentina would live to fight another day, as both normal and added time ended on the same nil-nil scoreline, and Argentina advanced 4-3 on penalties. Their groupmates would see a similar result; Italy and Portugal met at Saint-Denis in a showdown of two of the highest-ranked teams in the world in what had been thought was a potential final, and the favored Azzurri showed verve in fighting back to a 1-1 draw against Os Azules Reales as Graziano Pelle at 84' rescued Italy's Cup hopes in offsetting Nani's goal from the first half, and advanced 6-5 after Portugal failed to unlock Italy's veteran, famously stout defense for the thirty minutes of added time that followed.

Robert Brady and Wes Hoolahan enjoyed early chances against a Germany that looked rather mortal in Lyon, but failed to convert them and would come to regret that dearly, as Thomas Muller and Bastian Schweinsteiger scored quickly at 23' and 28' to take command of the match, with Mario Gotze adding a late penalty for good measure. While famed "giant-slayers" Ireland went down to defeat, however, Iceland stunned the world in Liege as they came back from a one goal deficit to dispatch Austria 2-1 [1], keeping their improbable fairy-tale run at the World Cup alive to become one of the great stories of not just the 2016 finals but of all time.

Britain had a long and sorry history of knockout round debacles, especially via way of penalty kicks, with such a method of loss having occurred now in the past four consecutive World Cups, with the most heartbreaking of the losses in 2008 when they had blown a 3-0 lead at the half in the World Cup Final. Old demons were exorcised in Marseille, however, as Britain defeated Colombia - who had knocked them out on penalties in the 2004 quarterfinals - after a 1-1 draw in which James Rodriguez had helped Colombia come back late and had nearly added a game-winner in added time. The Lions had held on, and would survive and advance out of penalty kicks for the first time since 1984, when they took silver in Russia. Groupmates Sweden and Bohemia also saw their match end on a 0-0 draw, a shock as Bohemia's tear through their group had made them overnight surprise favorites to finally take World Cup silverware home; that was alas not to be, as they were dispatched on penalty kicks 4-3 thanks in part to Sweden's stubborn, aggressive defense and what Bohemia supporters would for years afterwards maintain was shoddy refereeing.

Quarterfinals

Despite seeming mediocre for much of the tournament, Argentina found new fire at Saint-Denis as they faced off with France, taking the lead at the 50th minute and the hosts needing a late header from Raymond Balard to take the game to added time, where Olivier Giroud scored on a massive penalty at 116' to take France to the semifinals for the first time since 2004. Britain proved a stiff test for a Germany that had sliced through its competition so far, becoming the only team the entire tournament to prevent a single German goal all game; a Lions side not known for its tough defense managed to frustrate and infuriate Jurgen Klopp's Gegenpresse offense for ninety minutes in a remarkable tactical display by manager Gareth Southgate. On the flipside, Britain failed to find a goal for herself in all of this, with a crucial Harry Kane chance going wide and Wayne Rooney's header deflected out of danger by Manuel Neuer late; and in a grim reminder of World Cups past, Britain found itself staring down the barrel of another penalty kick, where Germany clinically and coolly advanced. German players later admitted that they thought Britain the toughest opponent of the tournament, and in their view the second or third best squad.

Australia, hoping to build off the moment of their 2012 miracle run and 2015 Confederations Cup championship, ran into the brick wall of Azzurri defense, and saw an early lead erased by young phenom Daniele Paolini and their penalty kick efforts snuffed out quickly by goalkeeper Gigi Buffon, with not a single Kickaroo penalty converting. The final quarterfinal, held in Marseille, pitted two Nordic sides against one another in an unlikely matchup of Iceland and Sweden, with the former in the midst of a true miracle run and the latter enjoying possibly her best tournament since the 1992 bronze medal performance. The game ended the only way it could have, becoming the fourth quarterfinal to go to added minutes and the third to head to penalties as two defensively-minded, offensively-challenged sides slugged it out without a goal for two hours, and Sweden returned to their fifth semifinal and first in a quarter-century, ending Iceland's dream run through a slice into the upper right of the net off the foot of captain Andreas Granqvist.

Semi-finals

One of the most famed footballing rivalries of all time is that of France and Germany, and they would connect for a semifinal match to mark the next chapter of said rivalry at Lyon for the semifinal turn. Germany had beaten France in Berlin in the final sixteen years earlier, off the head of Michael Ballack, and France hungered for their own glory on home soil as their archrivals had earned then. It was not to be - Germany jumped out to an early 2-0 lead they never relinquished, and by the end of the match the scoreline was 4-0. It was one of the most humiliating defeats in French sporting history, and ended an otherwise excellent run for the hosts to the point one could hear the silence in the stadium as the game concluded.

Italy and Sweden, for their part, met in their first faceoff at a major tournament since the group stages of Euro 2006 and their first match of real import since the 1992 semifinals, in which they had also met, then in Naples. In a strange twist of fate, the 2016 semifinal match in Saint-Denis between the Azzurri and the Tre Kronor ended on the exact same scoreline - a nil-nil draw at the end of one hundred and twenty minutes, Sweden's third such identical result and the first time that both sides in a semifinal were going to penalties for a third straight time - and, even more eerie, that Italy prevailed on penalties 6-5, just as they had in 1992. They their hopes for an improbable run to the Final were dashed, Sweden took the results as a good omen that they could take bronze off France in Marseille in the third-place game, while Italy dared to hope - in their time advancing not just to the Final but the last four since 1992 - that perhaps history was about to repeat itself as an excellent Germany awaited.

Third Place

Despite hopes that the magic of '92 was repeating itself, Sweden came staggering into the semifinals in Marseille having played a three hundred and sixty minutes of football over the course of the knockout round, compared to merely three hundred for France, and had gone through the psychologically-taxing gruel of two penalty wins and a penalty loss. The team looked clearly gassed even before taking the considerable talent differential into account, and then there was the matter of France, despite having just been run out of their own field in Lyon a few days earlier by their archrivals, being angry and eager to salvage something on home soil on behalf of their loyal fans.

As such, in a rematch of the Euro 2006 final, Sweden was obliterated from the get-go, giving up a goal in the fourth minute and France never looked back, scoring two more later in the game in what can best be described as a lazy but dominant performance. The hosts walked away with bronze medals and their last game was a win - just not the win they had wanted, even as they would be greeted the following week by a parade on the Champs d'Elysees as they brought home their first silverware in a decade.

[1] Assume my figures for the Group Stage were wrong, and Iceland was the group winner
 
God what a no show from France in the semis. I see you basically reworked Brazil from 2014 shitting the bed at home.
That was the inspiration! Bit of a combination between OTL’s Germany and the 08-12 Spain, with Klopp’s Gegenpresse replacing the tiki-taka (this is deep soccer nerd stuff lol)
 
2016 FIFA World Cup Final
The 2016 FIFA World Cup Final was held on July 10, 2016 in Saint-Denis, France and featured Germany and Italy facing off against one another; it was the 44th meeting of these two national sides, and their first meeting in a World Cup since the 1972 semifinal. Italy had, in four previous matches against Germany at the World Cup, never lost. The sides entered as the No.1 and No.3 sides in the world FIFA rankings, and Germany was the defending European Champions, having won at Euro 2014 in Turkey. Italy had previously won World Cup titles in 1972 and 1992; Germany had previously won in 2000, as hosts.

Germany advanced to the final having not allowed a single goal in any game throughout the entire tournament, and was one of two sides to take the full 9 points in its group stage; it thereafter defeated Ireland 3-0, advanced past Britain on penalty kicks after a 0-0 regulation result, and then defeated hosts France (the No.2 team in World rankings) 4-0 in the semifinal, and entered the match as nominal betting favorites. Italy, for its part, had arguably faced a more difficult path, with talented Argentina and Japan sides in its group and fighting to a 1-1 draw against a good Russia in her first match, and then advancing through three tough matches against Portugal, Australia and Sweden in the knockouts, with the 1-1, 0-0, and 0-0 matches all going to penalties. Thus Italy was thought to be at a slight disadvantage due to fitness after having played the equivalent of a whole full extra match coming in.

The match nonetheless started well for Italy, with them scoring the first goal allowed by Germany all tournament thanks to Lorenzo Insigne at 17'. German efforts to break through the tough Italian defense anchored by a number of tenured stalwarts failed, repeatedly, but Manuel Neuer saved a potential second goal from Ciro Immobile at 60' to preserve Germany's chances. The break came late, at 77', when Toni Kroos caught a cross from Marco Reus, passed it to Thomas Muller who immediately passed it straight back and he slid it in behind Italian keeper Gigi Buffon. That would prove to be the last major chance in regular time. In added minutes, Insigne looked ready to transcend into Italian myth with a long cross from Giorgio Chiellini taken, set up, and blasted past Neuer - only for it to be waved offsides, controversially, and video review suggesting it being a marginal call. This failure at 110' was compounded by Immobile's shot over the crossbar minutes later, and the game headed to penalty kicks, in which all five Germans sank their shots perfectly, and Italy's Graziano Pelle, in his last game for Italy, saw his shot to keep pace barely go off Neuer's fingers and thus off the bar and out of goal by mere centimeters. With Bastian Schweinsteiger completing the fifth penalty moments later, Germany had won their second World Cup in history, and made them simultaneous defending European and World champions, only the fourth side to hold that distinction (Britain '64 World Cup, '66 Euro; Italy '70 Euro, '72 World Cup; Spain '10 Euro, '12 World Cup). For his tying goal and play in the midfield throughout the match, Kroos was named Man of the Match.

The German team was greeted with a parade in Berlin that drew close to two million onlookers on July 12th upon their return from France, while Italy was celebrated for their first appearance in a Final since 1992 with a celebration in Rome; after the match, Italian football officials and players continued criticizing the officiating for the match, especially the disallowed goal which video review called into question. Italy and Germany would meet again two years later in the final of Euro 2018 in Berlin, where Germany once again triumphed, this time by a 3-1 scoreline.


1712596065680.png
 
2016 FIFA World Cup - Main Page
The 2016 FIFA World Cup was the 24th FIFA World Cup, a quadrennial international football tournament organized by FIFA and hosted by France between 9 June and 10 July 2016, after it was awarded the hosting rights at the 2005 FIFA World Congress. It was the second time France had hosted the World Cup, having previously hosted the inaugural 1916 edition of the tournament; it was thus also the centennial World Cup, referred to as the Coupe Centennaire in some marketing materials for the event.

The World Cup saw a record 12 previous winners of the World Cup appear in the tournament, all with the exception of 1976 champions Netherlands, as well as 20 other teams; 31 teams from 6 confederations advanced into the finals tournament via way of continental qualifiers and, if necessary, play-offs, and France qualified automatically as hosts. Three teams, two from the AFC (Vietnam, Kuwait) and one from UEFA (Iceland) made their World Cup debuts. 64 matches were played at 12 stadia in 11 different cities, with Saint-Denis (a suburb of France) hosting both the opening and closing games at the monumental national stadium, the Stade de France. The defending champions, Spain, were the fourth consecutive holder to fail to advance to the knockout rounds; previous winners Mexico and Brazil also failed to advance out of the group stage, as did 2012 runner-up Japan. Previous champions such as USA, Hungary, and Austria were eliminated in the Round of 16, while Britain and Argentina would go hope at the quarterfinals; it was the third time in which an all-European semifinal was formed with Germany, Italy, France and Sweden advancing, and the first time a semifinal featured all previous winners. Defending European champions Germany defeated Italy for their second World Cup title after a 1-1 game ended on penalties, while France took bronze over Sweden after having been defeated by Germany in their semifinal faceoff. With their win, Germany became the fourth team to concurrently hold the European and World championships, and by virtue of their victory were entitled to participate in the 2019 FIFA Confederations Cup.

The first World Cup to feature video-assisted refereeing, it was noted for a relatively high level of goals throughout play but was also cited as a mediocre tournament by many fans and pundits for a high number of red cards, bizarre offsides calls, and the frequency of games in the knockouts which ended on penalties after scoreless draws. The behavior of many ultras supporters organizations at the tournament also came under harsh criticism, both for the behavior of the fans themselves - in particular a massive brawl between Italian and Russian supporters in Marseille in their first group stage match - as well as the response of the French police as being arbitrarily and inconsistently harsh and lenient depending on the day. It was nonetheless a financial success and the most-watched television event in history, a major recovery from the financially disappointing 2012 World Cup in China four years earlier that had some of the worst viewership figures in history.

1712615382647.png
 
CSA isn't much of a soccer power internationally right?
Good question!

Traditionally, no. Football is considered the "negro sport" (that's using the polite phrasing), unlike rugby where they were strictly barred from participating because it's the "white man's game," but there's no real effort until the end of formal segregation in the early 1990s to do much of anything with that. The emergence of Iverson, Vick, etc in the late 90s/early 00s leads to a brief window in the 2000s where the CSA actually does quite well in football, but its definitely nowhere near what USA and Mexico, the only real CONAFA powers, regularly field. (And that's underselling it, seeing as Mexico has 5 World Cups and the US has 1).

That said a world where guys like Jalen Ramsey and Marlon Humphreys et al are playing football rather than gridiron like OTL is a world where the CSA through sheer athletic talent is going to do decently every now and then. So they're probably like a slightly, consistently worse USMNT, facing off against considerably superior continental opposition.
 
Good question!

Traditionally, no. Football is considered the "negro sport" (that's using the polite phrasing), unlike rugby where they were strictly barred from participating because it's the "white man's game," but there's no real effort until the end of formal segregation in the early 1990s to do much of anything with that. The emergence of Iverson, Vick, etc in the late 90s/early 00s leads to a brief window in the 2000s where the CSA actually does quite well in football, but its definitely nowhere near what USA and Mexico, the only real CONAFA powers, regularly field. (And that's underselling it, seeing as Mexico has 5 World Cups and the US has 1).

That said a world where guys like Jalen Ramsey and Marlon Humphreys et al are playing football rather than gridiron like OTL is a world where the CSA through sheer athletic talent is going to do decently every now and then. So they're probably like a slightly, consistently worse USMNT, facing off against considerably superior continental opposition.
Thanks for answering.

I'm assuming nothing close to Title IX passed down south so female sports in Dixie are well behind as well.
 
Similar to OTL.

CONAFA - North America, Central America, Caribbean
CONAME - South America less “Caribbean”
AFC - Asia
OFC - Oceania/parts of Malaya
UEFA - Europe
CAF - Africa
What does less Caribbean mean? Does that just mean that Trinidad and Tobago are in CONAFA or Colombia and Venezuela (and whatever is where Guyana/Surinam/FG) as well?

And over in a different sport, I expect women's ice hockey like iOTL to be dominated by the USA and Canada. After the dissolution of Canada, I expect Rump Canada to remain in the top few spots joined by Quebec. The maritime provinces play women's hockey, I just don't think they'll have the population to compete. As for the rest of the world, Sweden and Norway certainly and unfortunately indicating how the Finnish do would probably open too large a window on the future of the Russian Empire. (I could see all of the gold medals are won by the US and Canada except for the one Olympics where the entire US and Canadian teams end up in a brawl that would make the Charlestown Chiefs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slap_Shot ) proud and both teams are disqualified)

iOTL, women's olympic hockey is played under rules with significantly higher penalties for roughing/fights than the men's olympic hockey which have higher penalties than the NHL. Periodic suggestions from *both* the US & Canadian women's teams to play under rules allowing for rougher play (against each other) have been made.
 
What does less Caribbean mean? Does that just mean that Trinidad and Tobago are in CONAFA or Colombia and Venezuela (and whatever is where Guyana/Surinam/FG) as well?

And over in a different sport, I expect women's ice hockey like iOTL to be dominated by the USA and Canada. After the dissolution of Canada, I expect Rump Canada to remain in the top few spots joined by Quebec. The maritime provinces play women's hockey, I just don't think they'll have the population to compete. As for the rest of the world, Sweden and Norway certainly and unfortunately indicating how the Finnish do would probably open too large a window on the future of the Russian Empire. (I could see all of the gold medals are won by the US and Canada except for the one Olympics where the entire US and Canadian teams end up in a brawl that would make the Charlestown Chiefs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slap_Shot ) proud and both teams are disqualified)

iOTL, women's olympic hockey is played under rules with significantly higher penalties for roughing/fights than the men's olympic hockey which have higher penalties than the NHL. Periodic suggestions from *both* the US & Canadian women's teams to play under rules allowing for rougher play (against each other) have been made.
By Caribbean I mean the Guianas, which iOTL are in CONCACAF

Yeah, some mix of USA/Canada/Quebec dominate women’s hockey, with Sweden maybe just a ring below. Norway believe it or not is actually not much of a hockey power
 
Dannemyer v. California
Dannemyer v. California was a landmark 1996 United States Supreme Court case that held that state recall elections cannot be used against federal officials, with the case in question involving the ability of California citizens to recall Senator William Dannemyer.

Dannemyer was a former Liberal California Congressman from Orange County who had unsuccessfully conducted a primary campaign against Senator Ed Zschau from the right after his district was dramatically altered in the 1991-92 redistricting process, and was considered a darling of the California conservative movement in the early 1990s. A vehement opponent of then-California Governor Robert Redford at that time, upon Redford's election as President of the United States in 1992, Dannemyer became a leader of grassroots opposition, particularly in the Los Angeles suburbs, to the new administration but was largely ignored by Democratic and establishment Liberal officialdom. Dannemyer had declined to join the Independent Conservative Party in October 1991 upon its formation and thought himself proven correct when it only returned six Congressmen (out of twelve who had defected the Liberals and three from the Democrats upon its formation, and thirty-seven total ICP candidates in that fall's elections) and instead continued his long focus of continuing to act as a leader of discontented right-wing Liberals in California. In 1994, he successfully defeated two-term moderate Senator Bob Lagomarsino in the Liberal primary, and was simultaneously granted the ICP's line by a vote of the ICP nominating convention, and he was narrowly elected Senator in the 1994 midterm elections, with many Liberals angry that he nearly cost them a seat in a midterm in which they were already struggling against the ICP threat on the right, with the ICP winning 39 seats in the House and being regarded as partly responsible for splitting the vote to prevent larger Liberal gains (though even combining Liberal and ICP seats would not have given them a plurality or majority of seats, and the Democratic House Caucus had an organizational support agreement in place with the Socialists as a contingency plan for a plurality or hung House, which did not materialize).

However, a month later, on December 2, 1994, he announced that he would not caucus with the Senate Liberals and would instead become the second Independent Conservative Senator, outraging many moderate and mainstream conservative Liberals who had voted for him. Shortly after his inauguration in 1995, voters of all parties began circulating recall petitions against "Bill-trayal" and in May 1995, the newly-elected Secretary of State, Bill Jones, certified that there were more than enough signatures for a recall election. Dannemyer sued the state of California, first in California courts and then in federal court, arguing that the recall of a federal official was unconstitutional; the District Court of Southern California agreed, but this was narrowly overturned on appeal, and so the case wound up before the United States Supreme Court and was argued in December 1995, with the state of California supporting its recall law. In a unanimous decision in judgement penned by Chief Justice Robert Morgenthau, the Supreme Court rejected California's arguments, agreeing that while Dannemyer switching parties immediately after being elected was perhaps "an unseemly choice" it was in the end between himself and the voters, and that a recall election under a state constitution was an unconstitutional "qualification" upon a federal office. However, the reasoning against California was only 6-3; concurrences in the judgement from Justices Robert F. Kennedy and Sylvia Bacon agreed with the judgement, but disagreed with its reasoning as overbroad, and would have found against California because its recall election mechanism was a violation of the 15th Amendment's Senatorial appointment clauses, while Justice Mildred Lillie went the other direction and penned a concurrence suggesting that recall elections themselves, in any capacity and not just for federal officials, were constitutionally suspect.

In terms of real-world impact, Dannemyer v. California ended attempts to recall Congressmen and Senators entirely, a phenomenon that had been gradually gaining steam since the backlash to the Bribesville scandals of the era, but alongside ranked-choice voting and term-limits, federal recall was proposed as another constitutional amendment or part of an amendment in the context of the broader Redford Reforms of the mid-1990s. However, recall campaigns remained a staple of California politics in the late 1990s and early 2000s, eventually culminating in a stretch of late 2003 and early 2004 in which there were two to three recall elections for a variety of ballot positions every Tuesday for seventeen weeks, culminating in a 2004 referendum that dramatically overhauled the practice. Dannemyer, persona non grata amongst the two mainstream parties in California, earned a reputation as one of the Senate's most erratic, controversial figures in the late 1990s, doing much to damage the ICP with voters but also introducing conspiracy theories and aggressive populist rhetoric to a broader audience. Aware that he was unlikely to be elected, he chose not to seek a second term in 2000, when his seat was successfully carried by Democrat John Garamendi in a landslide to become the first Democrat in thirty years to hold the seat.

Reflecting on the case in his book Recall Wars, California political historian Dwight Darnold commented, "Dannemyer may have won the battle in 1996 but Robert Redford carried California eight months later by the widest margin a Democrat enjoyed since 1920 and over twenty years later the Liberals have still not recaptured the California Assembly; the conservative faction of the Liberals were effectively routed in both primary and general elections, and the power in the party shifted permanently to the Bill Joneses, Rick Riordans, and eventually Brian Sandovals of the world; the powers that be were never, ever going to get "Bill-trayed" again."
-------

(Lot going on here with some heavy Easter eggs; really just trying to capture the vibe of the OTL 1990s a bit, between the Redford-as-progressive-Reagan, California being California, and introducing the populist party of the right that has emerged to harass the Liberals)
 
In 1994, he successfully defeated two-term moderate Senator Bob Lagomarsino in the Liberal primary, and was simultaneously granted the ICP's line by a vote of the ICP nominating convention, and he was narrowly elected Senator in the 1994 midterm elections, with many Liberals angry that he nearly cost them a seat in a midterm in which they were already struggling against the ICP threat on the right, with the ICP winning 39 seats in the House and being regarded as partly responsible for splitting the vote to prevent larger Liberal gains (though even combining Liberal and ICP seats would not have given them a plurality or majority of seats, and the Democratic House Caucus had an organizational support agreement in place with the Socialists as a contingency plan for a plurality or hung House, which did not materialize).
Democrats to Liberals in 1994 re: vote splitting.

images
 
Top