It's a good book, although the USM's turning into a stereotypical Latin American state towards the end (charismatic Leader who puts dissidents in jail) and no real threat to the Ancien Regime in Europe for generations were a bit less than realistic (no US and no French revolutions would mean no 1848, but industrialization would generate enough instability to make things...interesting).
Has anyone read this masterpiece? This is the best AH I've ever read. It's a friggin history book! If you ripped out the first three pages, one would never know it's fiction.
There's fake footnotes, a fake bibliography, and even a fake critique in the back. It's amazingly detailed.
Can you tell me what's it about? Soldiers in the 19th Century? I might be interested. I spent 2 hours yesterday at the bookstore hunting for a good novel especially SF. I left with Battlestar Galactica novel because I couldn't find anything more worthy.
As Kidblast says, it's basically a fake history book - a history of North America written as if from a timeline where Britain put down the American Rebellion. Fantastic idea - it's time someone else wrote a book like that.
The recent paperback reprint doesn't have the map at the front, but there are maps of the timeline's N. America and Europe online somewhere. There's a summary of the timeline on Wikipedia.
York library in England also has it in the history section. But then in my experience, libraries always shelve books according to what they look like, not what their content is. Slough library has Guns of the South in their westerns section.
It's interesting in a boring sort of way, as an act of creative historigraphy, if you like it's at the opposite pole to Jean d'Ormesson's THE GLORY OF THE EMPIRE. Worth looking at- but not if your idea of AH is limited to Turtledove, Flint, Stirling, etc.
On the contrary: this is a neglected/underemployed form of alternate history. It's a few orders of magnitude better that the novel-style offerings because it's entirely plausible, with data to support the sequence of events and conclusions drawn.
Granted it reads like a college-level history text, but if you're going to present an alternate timeline in detail, this is the correct way to do it.
By the way, the übercorporation stevep was trying to recall was Kramer Associates.
LaSalle- no, it's not necessarily better- it's just different. Yes, I admire it- I forget when I first read it. More years ago than I like to think. But its main problem (in my opinion) is that it covers AH in terms of centuries rather than decades. It leaves the juice out of history.
Desperate to read it. Providing I can do so without paying for it.
Which is pretty much why I haven't yet.