The Changeling Way
  • As far as I know this is the right place for ideologies of fictional worlds.

    The Changeling Way

    Held by the Changeling Hives that exist hidden within Equestria, it can be summed up as

    -Never snitch on anybody, even rival Changelings, and least of all your own Hive. Maintain your disguises at all costs when in public. To the outside world Changelings are a myth. Keep it that way.
    -Share the love that you gain with your Hive, as the grubs have to eat as well.
    -Only use violence when you have to.
    -Obey your Queen, the Queen knows best.

    As heroes-As the Changelings feed on love, and love is in short supply in wartime, they have used their wiles and occasional well-placed violence and cocooning to replace war-hungry leaders, stopping wars before they happen to protect their food sources.

    As neutrals-For the most part, they use passive methods of love gathering, but are not above using force to cocoon others when love is scarce.

    As villains-They see themselves as a Master Race, and other races merely as love sacs waiting to be captured and drained of their love, then allowed to die. Queen Chrysalis was an extreme example of this, almost a Changeling Hitler, who was willing to break the Changeling Way itself and attack peaceful cities, cocooning everyone in sight to drain their love.
     
    Swiftism and other madness
  • Swiftism-Swifties take the songs and other pronouncements of Taylor Swift to heart. They are accepting of homosexuality and transsexuality, and try to be nice in their lives. At first they didn't have much to go on as she kept her politics to herself, but recently they have found out what she supports.

    As collectivist good guys-If Taylor Swift were one day to go into politics and win the Democrat nomination, they might propel her to the Presidency.

    As individualist good guys-They can't achieve much politically but they can make the world a nicer place.

    As individualist bad guys-One of them takes it to extremes and decides it would be a good idea to try and kill Kanye West, or starts stalking and trying to kill Taylor Swift's ex boyfriends.

    Localist Racism- In this timeline Plessy v Ferguson was decided differently by the US Supreme Court. Mandatory racism as practised by the South was deemed to be wrong, but so was mandatory desegregation. It would be up to each headmaster or board of governors, each landlord or landlady, each police chief, each town mayor, each property/business owner, each railroad/airline/ferry company to decide if they wanted to not be racist at all, be as racist as they had been before, or be racist to some groups but not others.

    As colectivist bad guys-The South is pretty much as racist by 2023 as it was in the 1890's, although with fewer lynchings. A few big companies have desegregated as it makes better economic sense, but most southern whites are still rabid racists.

    As individualist bad guys-Over time, most businesses have desegregated by 2023, as well as the majority of landlords and landladies, as it makes good economic sense. The larger towns and cities have largely desegregated for the same reason , but there are a few whites only towns in some places, and very few non whites in the police forces of the South. Most university's desegregated for financial reasons-Oxford Town University did so in 2017, but with many of the best schools whites only, not many blacks get good enough schooling to pass the entrence exams. Only the richest blacks can vote, poll taxes and felon disenfranchisement laws make sure of that, and equality protesters get tresspassed and arrested if they don't leave. However, racism in the South is-very slowly-on the way out due to economics. In another 50-100 years, the South is likely to stop being racist of it's own accord.
     
    Last edited:
    Boardism and more
  • Boardism
    Boardism can work with both dictatorships and democracies.

    The ruler of the country, who can either be freely and fairly elected or be a dictator, is called the Admin, and the police are called the Moderators.

    Criminals are only held in jail whilst awaiting trial, and for those found guilty and sane, there are only two punishments, the Kick and the Ban. Being Kicked means being forcibly exiled to another country, with or without the other country's OK. Being Banned means being executed. Those who come back before their Kick has expired are Banned. Typically, those who are kicked are sent somewhere like the EU, who is not legally allowed to send back anyone who will be executed. Some Boardist countries, rather then normally using the Ban, have a Permenant Kick for those who carry out murders and other serious crimes, and only enforce the Ban on those who come back or are forcibly sent back as a last resort.

    As individualist Good Guys

    The country has a democratic system and the laws are not too strict. For breaking a small one, people may be allowed to pay a fine or get a warning rather then a Kick. People are reasonably allowed to express themselves and even to criticize Admin and Mod decisions without punishment, and Kicks and any Bans are publically known about. Those who are Kicked are given a certain amount of money to support themselves and are sent to somewhere like Finland where there is a good welfare system and homelessness is rare to non-existant, and are often allowed back in a few months or years depending on the offence. For serious offences like murder or paedophilia, instead of a Ban there is sometimes a Permenant Kick, with a Ban only being used if the person comes back or is sent back against their will.

    As colectivist Good Guys
    Think modern-day Switzerland or modern-day Japan. Laws are strict, but enforcement is relatively fair. Whilst those who stick out too much are Kicked or occasionally perhaps even Banned if their crimes are very serious, there is democracy and most people are OK with it. . Those who are Kicked are given a certain amount of money to support themselves and are sent to somewhere like Finland where there is a good welfare system and homelessness is rare to non-existant, and are often allowed back in a few months or years depending on the offence. For serious offences like murder or paedophilia, instead of a Ban there is sometimes a Permenant Kick, with a Ban only being used if the person comes back or is sent back against their will.

    As individualist Bad Guys

    The Admin is a dictator, and outright Bans are quite common for relatively small offences. People who are Kicked are dumped in places like sub-Saharan Africa without money to support themselves, and Banned if they are sent back. For those who are Kicked, Permenant Kicks in inhospitable countries are common. People live in constant fear of the Moderators and the Admin.

    As collectivist Bad Guys
    Think Maoist China or modern day North Korea.

    The Admin is a dictator, and outright Bans are quite common for relatively small offences. People who are Kicked are dumped in places like sub-Saharan Africa without money to support themselves, and Banned if they are sent back. For those who are Kicked, Permenant Kicks in inhospitable countries are common. People live in constant fear of the Moderators and the Admin. Not only that, but the country tries to forcibly spread Boardism to smaller weaker countries.
     
    Magic through bad science
  • How about...

    Magic through bad science!

    Disappointed by people's skepticism about the supernatural, a group of believers in magic decide to rewrite the laws of physics / chemistry / nature so that these laws contradict many of our common experiences. That way, they can claim that the world is full of supernatural events! For example, they write a "law of nature" saying that metal objects cannot fly. This makes airplanes supernatural by definition. They fly through the power of Magic, even though science says tbey shouldn't be able to!
     
    Ludocracy
  • Ludocracy/Athletocracy

    Government by sportsmen, with conflicts resolved through sports. It's commonly said that the Olympics, or sports in general, are a substitute for war. Anthropologists have found this opinion globally in many indigenous cultures, and archaeology confirms many traditional sports are of considerable antiquity. However, it's also clear that tribes, peoples, countries, etc. have no reason to accept the result of a sports game when they feel they could succeed in a war for it.

    Therefore the goal becomes how to properly set up a government to make this concept work. I imagine it could only thrive within one culture, or very closely related ones. What I envision is that a hegemonic ruler would force his neighbours--and his vassals/internal contenders--into accepting resolution of disputes via the result of a sports match. This of course requires the culture to have that concept, but it isn't uncommon and has happened globally. The benefits of this are greater prosperity from not having destructive wars, which would let this culture react better to truly external threats (i.e. "barbarians").

    This culture would still have armies and a military, but they would be indistinguishable from their athletes. All soldiers would be athletes and vice versa. I envision the "best of the best" forming the actual teams competing in sporting events. The foremost general, or even the ruler himself, would be the coach, although he might do double-duty as team captain and actually get on the field (in any case, he's likely to have been an athlete himself). Lesser athletes would be the supporters. They would stay in the stands and cheer on their team while keeping a close eye on the enemy.

    If worst comes to worst, then the supporters will protect their athletes and ruler while driving off the enemy, but this would not be a common occurrence. Presumably a sports match in this society would be just as rowdy as certain teams around the world notorious for the actions of their supporters. It would be half ritual, half entertainment, potentially last days and multiple matches, and there would be much alcohol served, gambling, etc. and the resulting fights you'd expect.

    If needed, referees would be priests, possibly from a neutral third party state or a religious institution not seen to favour either party. Or perhaps a sovereign with minimal actual power but great cultural/political/religious influence, like the Japanese Emperor, might serve as referee, or perhaps a "league commissioner" of sorts.

    I envision this as hard to work in an international relations context, but within a single confederation or country might be feasible. As war becomes more complex with gunpowder weapons and battlefield artillery, this sort of system will likely break down, so it probably would not work past the 17th/18th century or so. At least not without insanely specific circumstance, like one could imagine a society ruled by super-intelligent AI having humans settle their affairs in sports (and possessing the ability to eliminate cheating).

    Potential societies--

    Ancient Greece - The ancient Olympics were a hugely important religious festival and actually did play an important political role. It seems very possible to take it further and have society be totally dominated by the Olympics (and similar competitions)

    Mesoamerica - The "Mesoamerican ballgame" had deep religious significance and like the Olympics, was used for political purposes. It quite literally did settle disputes between prominent figures and states in certain times and places. However, it was more entertainment than politics in the Aztec Empire, so Mesoamerica would still need some alternate PODs to get the ballgame as the centerpiece of society.

    Ancient China - The sport of cuju was first known in the Warring States era. Maybe it gets more popular earlier and the conflicts of that period are resolved over cuju matches?

    Medieval Japan - Kemari descends from cuju (and is written with the same kanji) and was popular in the Imperial Court during the late Heian period. It continued rising in popularity in the subsequent Kamakura period and reached the warrior class as a whole in the Muromachi period. One could imagine with the right series of PODs the Shogun and Emperor telling the parties of the OTL Onin War to settle it over kemari instead of repeatedly burning down Kyoto.

    Future Earth - We get taken over by AI, but the AI doesn't intervene much in our affairs beside telling us to stop fighting wars and settle it through sports instead
     
    Blackism and Socialism with Indonesian characteristics
  • Blackism: a left-wing ideology formed among African Americans following an alternate successful Reconstruction. It seeks to defy the white supremacist status quo of the old South and America as a whole by pushing for greater political and social inclusion for blacks. Another main tenet of Blackism is the promotion of an African-American cultural identity to help blacks overcome their internalized prejudice and shame. Blackism's socialist aspects are rooted in the land redistribution policies carried out during Reconstruction, and this played a part in the growth of America's labor movement in the late 19th century.

    Socialism with Indonesian characteristics: Might be the PKI's ideology had it came to power. It is basically Sukarno's Marhaenism and Tan Malaka's Madilog philosophy mixed with Marxism-Leninism. However, the religious aspect of "Sukarnoism" is de-emphasized and replaced with secularism.
     
    Slaver Socialism
  • Slaver Socialism
    All free adults who are not convicted criminals are given two slaves by the government at the age of 18. Some rent theirs out for money, others let their slaves run businesses and take a large cut of the profits. Those free people who become rich or were born rich can afford more slaves.

    As individualist "good guys".

    Most slave owners are OK to their slaves and tend not to treat them too harshly, as they know that if their two freely-given slaves die, they can only get more if they buy them, and buying slaves is expensive. Those jobs that are military/security related, "fun", professional careers (lawyers, politicians and the like) or too dangerous to give to slaves(like working at nuclear power plants) are staffed by free, paid workers, but all the rubbish jobs, and a lot of the middle rank jobs, are held by slaves. Many owners treat their slaves as part of the family rather then being very cruel to them, to lessen the chances of escape or revolts. Any race can be enslaved, not just black people. A slave owner can be enslaved if found guilty of certain crimes against free people or the government. Slavery for life is rare, most owners freeing their slaves when they reach the age of 70. Certain slaves have even become famous, although most of what they earn goes to their master or misstress.

    As colectivist "good guys"


    Most slave owners are OK to their slaves and tend not to treat them too harshly, as they know that if their two freely-given slaves die, they can only get more if they buy them, and buying slaves is expensive. Those jobs that are military/security related, "fun", professional careers (lawyers, politicians and the like) or too dangerous to give to slaves(like working at nuclear power plants) are staffed by free, paid workers, but all the rubbish jobs, and a lot of the middle rank jobs, are held by slaves. Many owners treat their slaves as part of the family rather then being very cruel to them, to lessen the chances of escape or revolts. Any race can be enslaved, not just black people. A slave owner can be enslaved if found guilty of certain crimes against free people or the government. Slavery for life is illegal. Certain slaves have even become famous, although most of what they earn goes to their master or misstress.

    On paper at least, and in the large towns and cities in practise, slaves have some rights. They have Christmas Day, Boxing Day and New Year's Day as holidays, and torture or murder of them and the removal of their body parts are banned. After 30 years, and sooner in cases of gross unpleasantness against them, they are freed and given two slaves of their own.

    As individualist bad guys.
    Although there are exceptions, a lot of slave owners are very cruel, and an owner can treat their slaves however they like. Those jobs that are military/security related, "fun", professional careers (lawyers, politicians and the like) or too dangerous to give to slaves(like working at nuclear power plants) are staffed by free, paid workers, but all the rubbish jobs are held by slaves. Middle ranking jobs are mostly held by free people. At best, most slave owners think of their slaves as tools. Whippings and other forms of torture are common and so is rape. Many slaves spend their whole lives as slaves from the cradle to the grave or the urn, and they are kept in order with harsh punishments even for small offenses.

    As collectivist bad guys

    Slave owners here get their slaves taken away and given to someone else if they are caught being nice to them. . Those jobs that are military/security related, "fun", professional careers (lawyers, politicians and the like) or too dangerous to give to slaves(like working at nuclear power plants) are staffed by free, paid workers, but all the rubbish jobs are held by slaves. Middle ranking jobs are mostly held by free people. Slaves have no rights at all. Whippings and other forms of torture are common and so is rape. Many slaves spend their whole lives as slaves from the cradle to the grave or the urn, and they are kept in order with harsh punishments even for small offenses. For rebellion, they are tortured to death if recaptured. A nation like this sees many other nations as inferior and as ripe for conquest to bring in a glut of slaves-more so if there are no nukes in this world. Think Nazi Germany or the worst excesses of Mao Zedong's China.
     
    Total militarism
  • Double post to separate reply from ideology post.

    Total militarism
    Taking army-with-a-state literally, under total militarism there is no distinction between army and state. Law is enforced by military police and sentences are handed down by military judges. Educational system, healthcare, industry, agriculture you name it just another branch of armed forces. All citizens wear uniforms and live in barracks.

    I'm not making individualist variations because I imagine this ideology as inherently collectivistic.

    Collectivist good guys
    Despite being organized along military lines, some form of democracy still exists under the system. The culture is somewhat harsh and conformist, but usually not too extremely so. Military run schools are strict, but students being outright tortured is rare and frowned upon.

    Collectivist bad guys
    Government is run by the supreme commander, who rules with an iron fist. Military run schools are a horrible places where students are treated with cruelty by both the staff and their fellow students. People who grow up in this system embrace a brutal and cut-throat society. There is a strict hierarchy and blind obedience is expected.
     
    Last edited:
    Engineerism
  • Engineerism, also STEMism by some annoying academics

    You know, its kinda strange that of the famous bad political figures of the 20th century you can nary find an engineer or drop out engineer among them just failed artists, failed priests, former school teachers, failed lawyers, etc. Clearly these non-hard science disciplines only served to rot their brains and render them utterly unable to engage in personally great works. Why won't one feel alienated when they haven't felt the pure euphoria of solving a complicated direct or abstract problem of reality?.

    Of course the fact that these problematic creatures were below mediocre or outright failures also spake volumes about them. Clearly creatures of spite, as such the engineers decided that not only will they take over only the most impressive among them in their deeds and developments will be allowed into the highest echilons of power and their concerns about not being able to engage in the work of their love or be burdened by the great weight of responsibility of the state by being recognized even officially as rubber stamps with a role more centred on serving as a sieve and representative than as the giver of law, tho they could do the latter as well if they all agreed on a position.

    And of course this isn't just how the higher ups ar decided but everyone along the hierarchy. The greater your proficiency in Engineering, the higher up you rise and you are always encouraged to take time off political work to focus on Engineering work and let someone from lower down the hierarchy to get some experience in ur role.

    Aside from this the organization of a state run by Engineers quickly came to more and more mirror that of the work site with major variations, of course.

    But of course, Engineers might be mighty impressive but an Engineering revolution has nierry the numbers nor chance to take over the country when not even every Engineer yet supports them and many other STEM fields have a similarly clean record (tho, health workers and especially theorists were looked at with suspicion) so they joined hands with other proficient in the applied hard sciences with the exact same treatment and opportunities as Engineers.

    As for those of the other disciplines? Well, they were kicked out as much as possible from gaining power with restrictions even put on their immediate living offspring and their children to keep the corruption of the arts and soft sciences at Bay and those most inflicted, under great scrutiny. And as has arguably already been happening, the teachings and practices of the non-STEM disciplines are further forced to conform to the Engineering standard.
     
    Last edited:
    Various ideologies
  • A few more short concepts:
    • A state that allows any person or group to declare independence whenever. And the state is required to give the separatists enough farmland to feed themselves with. And they can even rejoin any time! Some crafty folks have perfected the art of borrowing money, seceding, rejoining with a new name and a blank slate, rinse and repeat, but it's hard to pull this off successfully.
    • A fringe socialist movement for the 21st century that declares that going from capitalism to socialism is too hard, and so an intermediate step is needed: quasi-medieval theocracy! They reassure everyone that the theocracy won't be oppressive at all, it will be totally chill, and will teach everyone how to love each other, and stuff.
    • A conspiratorial group who are plotting to overthrow the government, because... because they really enjoy overthrowing the government. That's like, they're only objective. They don't have any plans for sweeping policy changes, they aren't even interested in using political office to get rich, they just fetishize the very act of a coup d'etat. If they succeed at taking power, they will immediately start plotting to overthrow themselves, because that's just what they like to do.
     
    Cellular Kritocracy
  • My first try at one of these! Going a little "wacky" for it.

    Cellular Kritocracy​

    Cellular kritocracy is theoretical type of government intended to appear to be a bottom-up government that is resistant to anarchy &/or "mob rule".
    Characteristics inherent to cellular kritocracy are strong divisions of power & localism. The divisions of power flows, technically, all the way down to the lowest level.

    The legislative division functions very similarly to cellular democracy. Each division forms a council & each council selects representatives to represent their division in the council for the higher division. And that process repeats until the national division is reached. The job of the legislative councils is to write & propose laws & actions, they do not pass them. These laws only apply within the context of that specific division. Since there's more to cellular kritocracy, the division need not be similar in population & can have differing traditions. For example:
    1. Four types of 1st level divisions:
      • Hamlet. The council consists of everyone present at the meeting, there is no chairman.
      • Village. The council consists of everyone present at the meeting, there is a chairman.
      • Town. The council consists of elected representatives, anyone present at the meeting can join the discussion but not vote.
      • City. The council consists of elected representatives, they're the only ones at the meeting & can vote.
    2. County. Operates like a city.
    3. Province. Operates like a city.
    4. Nation. Operates like a city.

    The other primary branch is the judiciary branch. Judicial court are made of judges, judges are held to a certain level of understanding of the laws. And each judicial court is connected to a specific regional divisions. It's the judges' job to pass the laws & actions proposed by their legislative council. Anytime there is a conflict between a two laws the highest relevant court adjudicates. If a regional division doesn't have enough population to have its own dedicated court (i.e. hamlets & villages) then a they would "borrow" a judge from a town or city it is connected to. (Judges from hamlets/villages would also serve in the connected city/town courts.)

    While the legislature can't pass a law or action no matter how bad they want to, there is no limit to the number of times the same law or action can be proposed. So they can effectively filibuster a court.

    The military is an independent branch & is lead by the highest ranking military officer, who serves as an adviser to both the supreme legislative council and he supreme court. During peacetime, the military can not act on it's own accord outside of small scale emergency situations. During wartime the military has full independence to act as it needs, so long as it doesn't infringe on the laws (generally national laws, however if a garrison is stationed domestically the laws of those regional divisions count). A state of war can only be entered and existed by the supreme legislature proposing it and the supreme court approving it.

    Individualist "good guys"
    The supreme justice in each region acts as a paternal leader, nurturing & protecting their region.
    Collectivist "good guys"
    The populace takes the largest active role the system allowing the legislative councils responding to everyone's wants & needs.
    Individualist "bad guys"
    The supreme justices wield their authority like a dictator & won't allow any law or action to pass that doesn't directly benefit him or herself. Probably using favors or threats to control the other justices.
    Collectivist "bad guys"
    The populace wield the legislative councils positions like a club, calling them to filibustering everything to the point where the government is forced into shutting down if they don't get what they want.

    Due to the localistic nature, it would be possible to see all four of these in the same country at once.
     
    Cohort Democracy
  • Cohort Democracy​

    While cohort democracy could be used as a complete form of government, it would normally be intended to be a piece in a larger government e.g., representative republic, parliamentary monarchy, etc.

    Cohort democracy is built of the idea of voting cohorts. These are a group of around 3-12ish people (they don't need to be all the same size, but too many more or less defeats the purpose of having them). Each cohort is given the number of votes equal to the number of people in the cohort, however the cohort votes as group meaning all the votes must be the same. Individual voting is not allowed, a person must be part of a cohort to cast their vote. Cohorts need to be registered & a person cannot be part of more than one cohort at the same time.

    There are two basic ideas that cohort democracy attempts to address.
    • The first, is to "force" deliberation before voting. Since all votes must be the same before being cast, the cohort would have to deliberate their options before casting it.
    • The second, is to ensure that the "collective good" isn't lost to personal interests, since the decision is support to happen as a group.

    "Voting abuse" would be a concern, & regulations should be in place to prevent "bullying".

    Right off I can see three different flavors in addition to the generic version:

    Family Cohort Democracy​

    The default cohorts are families, extended families. Obviously, new cohorts would have to be able to be formed, but unless an individual registers otherwise, they would be included in their family's cohort by default. Children, may or may not be included in the number of votes the cohort receives.​
    (Great for distributist countries)​

    Syndicalist Cohort Democracy​

    Cohorts are formed out of the individuals' jobs. I cohort may be everyone within a particular factory, or even department of that factory depending on it's size.​

    Geographic Cohort Democracy​

    Cohorts are formed out of location, such as a single street or a city block.​
     
    a bunch of ridiculous futuristic ideologies straight from the worldjerking subreddit
  • a bunch of ridiculous futuristic ideologies straight from the worldjerking subreddit
    Neo-pastoralism with antibiotic characteristics- Deliberate efforts to live outwardly low-tech lives for improved quality of life in a primarily pastoralist (herd-raising) context (though doesn't exclude farming). Everyone knows their place in the structure but also little room for advancement or growth. I allow that certain technologies (such as medicine) are maintained.

    19A0s vapor-futurist corporatism- Think cyberpunk but without the cybernetics; a retrogression to pre-End-of-History capitalist status quo. Corporations rule, like the Korean chaebol, but with an aesthetic similar to 70s or 80s futurist ideas; muscle cars and neon lights with fragments of former pop culture chopped and screwed into new shapes (the 'vaporwave' aesthetic). The 19A0s are a tongue-in-cheek conspiracy theory that says there was a lost decade between the late 70s and early 80s that 'explains' massive changes in pop culture, music and society around this time, but that it's been removed from our memories. This would be an attempt to recreate that Lost Decade.

    Voluntarist post-agrarianism- A voluntary regression to hunter-gatherer norms; attempting to live in homeostasis with nature, possibly only possible after a collapse removes Westphalian nation states. Voluntaryism is a form of libertarianism but here is used to imply a degree of free association that allows like-minded individuals to re-form villages and tribes; those who no longer wish to live with their tribe, or those tribe no longer wants them, move on and start their own village.

    Neo-nomadic modular post-urbanism - The decline of home ownership and the need for personal mobility in the face of mass migration evolves into a new nomadism; everyone owns no more than they can fit into their vehicle, or lives in mobile communes. These vehicle share a common tool set so can be taken apart and reassembled to meet changing needs throughout your lives. You might call this 'Sensible Max'.

    Post-scarcity neo-Victorian perma-academia- Once it's no longer necessary to struggle to secure the means of life, and with human healthspans extended almost indefinitely, how will humans occupy their time? One possibility is that the world devolves into a massive orgy of sex and drugs. After some time, however, it's possible that the reverse happens and, with nothing to gain or prove, the world settles down into something a lot more sedate and possibly even moralistic; the model that is settled upon here is that of the university; students live and work in halls of residence, studying the accumulated knowledge of the world during the day and helping with such tasks as are necessary to maintain the university and grounds.

    Art Deco trans-centrist secular messianism.-
    'Trains centrism' is a tongue-in-cheek concept I developed on Twitter, using the apparent phenomenon of the 'trains horseshoe' (where the more extreme one becomes politically the more one tends to like trains specifically as a method of public transport) to posit that the political spectrum is actually a sphere, with a 'trains centrism' on the antipode to regular centrism. It also means, with a more sinister edge, those centrists who 'don't care how we get to a functioning society, as long as the trains run on time'. This world would see a mixed-economy model promoted and enforced almost religiously by a body or ideology (think a Rand or Hubbard) whose goal is the defeat of death and the natural world; a 'secular messianism' that holds that man can overcome absolutely. Such a world would promote economic freedom (within limits) but not necessarily social freedom; the Project's ideology would be supreme and speaking out against it tantamount to terrorism.

    Fully automated luxury ruralism (on closer inspection this image is probably intended to be post-apocalyptic as the robot is overgrown with vines, but I will assume that this is camouflage to allow it to blend into the rural scene)- The growth of automation makes it possible to live lives of ease and comfort, with most people choosing to live in small, tight-knit communities, far outside the former cities, which have been left to decay. Robot labour, carefully concealed and camouflaged, does the heavy lifting, with humans joining in only to the extent that it's enjoyable.

    Interplanetary colonial homeostasis- Your typical 'expand throughout the universe' story, but with one important difference; no terraforming is allowed and efforts are made to live in as close to a 'natural' way on each world as possible.

    Post-mortality gamer technarchy- With death defeated, the physical world itself seems grey and uninteresting, when endless lives in fantasy realms are possible. Unlike some predictions people choose not to 'jack in', but instead live real-world lives in small, comfortable apartments, maintained by robots who bring food, clothing and other comforts, with the vast majority of their human interaction being in virtual worlds. With neural networks taking oversight of distribution and maintenance firmly out of human hands, the rulers of this new world are the designers and top players of the virtual worlds humans choose to inhabit; not a technocracy (rule by the skilled) but technarchy (rule by technarchs, the masters of technology).

    Benevolent Gothic-styled cyber-thearchy- Not a theocracy (rule by priests) but thearchy (rule by a god). AI has developed to the point where it is self-aware and impossibly intelligent, but still deeply concerned with human well-being and the task of optimising human happiness. To enforce its authority, the AI (or AIs, if there are multiple competing forces) present themselves much as the gods of previous eras (who can after all, be seen as AIs on a human substrate), adopting the aesthetics of a more detail-orientated time. Efficiency with redundancy is the hallmark of its regime - tools are built to last so as not to waste resources, but there is no single lynchpin (the AI's own cores, displayed to pilgrims in cavernous cathedrals, are backed up thousands of times)

    Cybernetic neo-predator mind transfer- As understanding of consciousness grows, it becomes possible for humans to desert humanity altogether, and many choose to live in simpler forms - wolf-like creatures running impossibly fast through the night, chasing down prey and revelling in their machine-aided supremacy over any natural creature.

    K-selective techno-Darwinistic v-Exitism- The IQ required to destroy the world gets one point closer to the norm every decade. At some point, a super-villain - a 'Dr Gno', if you will - will acquire the ability to end the world on his terms, preserving his own genes and possibly those of his family or ethnic group. But this doesn't end the story - instead, it begins a cascade of growth and destruction as natural variation produces geniuses who decide their best chance of survival rests in the elimination of all rivals. Ultimately, this v-Exitism - 'Exitism with Violence' will lead to a group of humanity leaving Earth, rendering it uninhabitable in the process to ensure that no-one can follow them. Will the pattern repeat among the stars?

    Dyson Sphere aestivation- One explanation for the apparent lack of alien life in the cosmos is that they are all sleeping while the suns are literally shining, storing the energy of their star for use in a period where the universe is at a far lower energy level and the thermodynamic gradient between their stored energy and the environment is far greater. Ensconced within a Dyson Sphere, their civilisation would output virtually no electromagnetic signal. While 'sleeping', it would be possible for the species to inhabit a shared dream - a looping simulation (or recorso) on a superconducting substrate consumes no energy, providing every loop leads back to the starting state. What sort of simulation would such beings choose to inhabit? Perhaps a simulation of their own culture, set in the distant past?

    Interplanetary arcology monumentalism- The universe seems empty because it *is* empty. Earth is the only planet upon which intelligence ever has or will arise. Feeling the weight of this awesome responsibility, humankind embarks upon the ambitious project of becoming the Primogenitors of universal life, seeding millions of worlds with gene-engineered primordial life, containing the potential to evolve into broadly familiar forms. While humanity waits, it builds great structures across the universe - mind-boggling arcologies, megastructures around stars, servicing the human civilisation but also preparing for the day when our children will launch a rocket into the heavens and land upon their moon, only to find plaques and empty structures of unknown purpose, all bearing a script strange to them.

    Panspermia Genesis Re-enactment Society- How best to spread the human race throughout the stars? One possibility is this: we terraform a world into an idyllic paradise, in which man can survive without any artificial aid. Then we take a genetically engineered man and woman, designed to contain enough variation to sustain a human population, grown to adulthood in a laboratory, and place them down on this world, and hovering above them in our transfigured bodies, command them 'Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it'. And if they discover, as we did, that all is not as it seems, and that we are no gods, they will have earned their place among the stars, as we did. And perhaps they will change a world after the pattern of their own, and taking a man and a woman, place them down, saying 'Be fruitful, and multiply...'.

    Post-Clarkian Singularity Thaumatarchy- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic, even to its users. We no longer know how the technology works, or how it develops itself, but we manipulate it with commands in the archaic languages it was written, and step from world to world on staircases of shining substance. The rulers of this world are the thaumuturges - the wonder-makers who speak to the great intelligences that reside in the plenum and command the forces of the Irreal.
     
    Erosocracy
  • Erosocracy. Think of it like Theocracy but for Romantic love. The purpose of the state is to be guided by and promote the growth of ideal Romantic relationships between people in a relationship, where each fulfils the role of the magical other to the other, the purpose of life to the other in the relationship. Of course, in theory this could be applied a million different ways, but how it manifested in the Erotic republic of France was basically and education system to make everyone into the ideal partner, starting first with the general preferences and as we specialize in our fields of study and careers, we also specialize in what Romantic archetype to embody as one matures through the educational system until at tertiary levels we have very specific archetypes one could even call them fetishes.

    Aside from the clear growth of the ideology from a time of idealizing Romance, it also argued for other practical benefits. People could fulfil each other better than any religion or ideology and we all know that a mentally and morally healthy population is of better quality as individuals and as an emergent group than anything that a religion or ideology could manage, that it would lower corruption by allowing us to focus our drive away from money and power (tho, "power mongers" as the Erosocracy called their evolutionary psychology bent critics claim that much corruption is already caused by valuing interpersonal relationships and the human drive for power, over the community so this risks to form predatory power couples) and redirect it towards Romantic love, increase life spans, reduce stress and so many other personal, social and political benefits.
     
    Last edited:
    Powerism
  • Powerism :- A philosophy that posits that humans have a drive for freedom, autonomy and most importantly, power that must be satisfied, infact, the government should be as obligated to satisfy it as they are to satisfy hunger, even more so given solving the former problem is a problem that they have come far closer to succeeding in that the power, freedom and autonomy problem. It was the coalescing of several controversial theorists and social movements usually divided up like this; Women are into powerful men(Red pill, Evolutionary Psychology); Men, especially extra-ordinary have a compulsion, a will to gain power that if not fulfilled leads to psychological damage(Nietzche, Arthur Schopenhauer); and Humans in general have a biological compulsion as serious as any other to experience a power process, a process of expressing their power and agency on the environment(Ted Kaczynski, Desmond John Morris, Zoology).

    As such it posited that we don't just want P,F&A directly but also indirectly, with women being easier to satiate with indirect P,F&A than men are so the goal isn't just to let people attain P,F&A but to reduce the relational distance between them and P,F&A. However, this must be done without veering into "masturbation" or a "voyeurism" of P,F&A and example of this would be fan support for a sports team or celebrity, while that might solve P,F&A as a state issue, it does so short sightedly by creating tribalism and doesn't solve it personally so that people would still suffer from a lack of P,F&A and take their daily jerk offf to P,F&A to escape that concern.
     
    SPAGYRIC
  • Can't believe I forgot to crosspost this one I made awhile ago 😂 I was going to dust it off and modify it for a Fullmetal Alchemist crossover idea so have a look at Spagyricism, a heterodox ideology based on democratic peasant populism and alchemical theory!

    Green_lion_consuming_the_sun.jpg


    SPAGYRIC
    "As above, so below"

    A product of the tumultuous period that birthed the German Renaissance and the Protestant Reformation, spagyric, also occasionally known as "the German Ideology" or "the doctor's disease", arose from the cross-pollination of ideas common in the German lands brought about by the rapid adoption of the printing press in the 16th century. Rooted in the life and work of noted alchemist, theologian and philosopher Theophrastus von Hohenheim, who lived from 1493 to 1541, following his death his methodology would be adopted by the Paracelsian school of medical thought, which continued his focus on direct experience over received wisdom and his firm belief in the necessity of balance between the microcosm and the macrocosm.

    This intellectual tradition would over time acquire its political focus as the aftermath of the German Peasant's War continued to ripple though the century. Although the conflict had still been a rout for the Peasant's Army, a better showing than OTL (and more survivors) had seen the democratic ethos and anti-Magisterial tenor of the movement spread throughout Germany even in the face of repression from secular and religious authorities. The spagyric movement would spend roughly a century refining its doctrine and theories of government, forming the nucleus of the Continental Age of Enlightenment in the wake of the midcentury German Revolutions.

    Ideology- Spagyric revolves around a political interpretation of several alchemical metaphors championed by Paracelsus himself.
    • "As above, so below"- The exact definition of the central macrocosm-microcosm balance has shifted as the ideology has become more overtly political and the science of astronomy has advanced, with a focus on balancing the people and the government inherited from the democratic ethos of the Revolt. Democratic local power therefore demands democratic central power, with a focus on consensus and evidence-based decision making over hereditary privilege or hierarchical leadership. The focus on balance also favors a class-collaborationist approach at home and a pursuit of harmonious relations abroad. Unless provoked or attacked, in which case "restoring balance" can excuse a wide variety of extremely radical or interventionist policies.
    • The Three Principles: As Paracelsus taught that all things were made up of a balance between energetic Sulfur, fluid Mercury and stable Salt, spagyric governments seek a balance between these three forces in the body politic through specially delineated tripartite legislative bodies, with the sulphuric chamber drawn by lot and capable of proposing and debating legislation, the saline chamber made up of appointed censors to examine and challenge unjust or ill-defined laws, and the mercurial chamber to balance the two, elected by the population to amend and pass legislation and constitute the executive organs of the state.
    • The Hermetic Spectrum: Spagyric does not rationalize itself along a spiritual good/evil binary or a more familiar progressive/conservative political one, but rather between balance and imbalance, the hermetic-dynamic axis. In the spagyric context, the hermetic position is one which maintains equilibrium between all levels and sectors of society, whatever that means in a particular context, while dynamic positions seek to disproportionately shift the social system in favor of one group or other, or to strike first in an international conflict. The hermetic position is not merely classically conservative however, actively intervening as scientific knowledge, technological capabilities and material relations between social groups change to best balance the social equation.
    Methodology- Befitting a movement founded on empirical study and democratic principles, spagyric takes great pride in a robust and widely accessible education system, viewing an educated population as best able to achieve a harmonious social order. The focus on direct experience is especially pronounced in the sciences, where an emphasis on testing and experimentation has made spagyric polities the center of major advancements in chemistry, medicine, astronomy and engineering over the centuries. The focus on social-personal interpretation of the macrocosm-microcosm balance has unfortunately made the spagyric movement one with an extremely invasive public health regime, with Paracelsus's own focus on diet and good health having gradually morphed into a culture where large societal-scale chemical, dietary and behavioral experiments are an accepted part of life. Thankfully unlike many examples from OTL these experiments are not used in a classist or racist way, but out of a genuine desire to continually improve the standard of living for all citizens.

    Symbology- While the three legislative chambers tend to utilize their relevant alchemical symbol, the broader movement as a whole is typically represented by a green lion devouring the sun, a symbol likewise derived from alchemy to represent perfection or completion.
    d8a5660c4bcf8b4eedfe345628cf3fb5.jpg

    -The symbols of the Three Principles, Sulfur, Mercury and Salt, which form the basis of the spagyric political system.


    View attachment 718691

    - The flag of the Spagyric Roman Republic (Spagyrische Römischen Republik) combines several traditional German colors in a new design influenced by alchemical symbolism and the circumstances of the nation's founding in the wake of the Thirty Years War and the German Revolutions. The vertical segment features an inversion of the black on gold of the HRE Imperial Banner and depicts a green lion devouring the sun as a symbol of spagyric and the aspiration toward an ideal society. Taken with the stripes the black also represents "nigredo", the first stage of the Magnum Opus representing decomposition. From the bottom, the white ("albedo", purification), yellow ("citrinitas", enlightenment) and red ("rubedo", completion) stripes represent the successive stages of this process.

    Time got away from me and I have to be at the airport in an hour so I'll just lay out my notes on the German Revolutions rather than doing a paragraph style update 😅 As mentioned before a more lenient end to the Peasant's War has led to a century of spreading radicalism among the peasant class even as the German intellectual scene has come increasingly under the influence of spagyric thought. In universe whether you refer to the conflict as the Thirty Years War or the German Revolutions is seen as a pretty good indicator of the sides you believe were in the right.

    Phase I: 1618-1635
    • The causes of the war are broadly similar, with a conflict between Catholic Ferdinand and Protestant Frederick over the crown of Bohemia (and with it Ferdinand's election as Holy Roman Emperor) spinning into a broader conflict within the empire over sectarian lines.
    • Because of dynastic ties this brings in the Spanish on the side of Austria, the first in a string of foreign nations to offer support for one side or the other. Most prominently in the first phase Sweden supported Frederick, while Britain briefly harried the Spanish before negotiating a peace and the Dutch revolted against the Spanish.
    • During this early period, broad discontent with the political and religious causes of the war (helped along by the ravenous mercenaries used liberally by the belligerents) gradually becomes a more potent force among the populace as the war drags on, leading to a growing undercurrent of populist anger in the vein of the Peasant's revolt.
    • The spagyric movement also spreads among the armies due to the sheer volume of spagyric practitioners acting as battlefield doctors, inspired by Paracelsus's own time as a field surgeon during the Venetian Wars.
    • Although France was also Catholic Spanish involvement on the side of the Austrians brings them in on the side of the Protestant states in the conflict, ratcheting up the tension and kicking off the second phase.
    Phase II: 1635-1648
    • This new phase of the war sets off a perfect storm of factors, with the example of the ongoing Dutch War of Independence and the growing populist backlash against the aristocracy sparking off a wave of mutinies, desertions and populist revolts throughout the Holy Roman Empire.
    • At first disorganized, the survivors of the Peasant's War had gained hard won experience about the importance of organization, leading to a century-old tradition of militias operating quietly without official sanction. This tendency serves them well in the conflict, with preexisting militias gaining valuable field experience defending themselves against mercenaries. By the time this second phase begins this has also exposed them to spagyric ideas, creating the synthesis that forms the core of the movement.
    • Far better organized than their ancestors and opposed largely by hired mercenaries or exhausted soldiers of one side or the other the conflict decidedly turns against both Austria and France, with the former having been forced to rely on Spanish manpower in the first place and the latter distracted both by war with Spain and a homegrown Protestant insurrection.
    • What follows is largely a period of consolidation as new revolutionary governments are proclaimed and the new German identity solidifies, with the Spagyric Roman Republic declared in 1648. In an ironic twist the Spanish Habsburgs actually come out in far better shape than the Austrian branch, with the latter losing a chunk of their Germanic heartland in the bargain.
    The new government has a blend of democratic and antidemocratic features, with the Sulphuric Chamber drawn by lot from a pool of all adult men, the Mercurial Chamber elected proportionally by the many (many many...) states and free cities that make up the Republic and the Saline Chamber in turn appointed by the Mercurial one.

    Later Speaker of the Mercurial Chamber Johann Joachim Becher, when speaking of the Revolutions, would come to define what he called "the phlogiston theory of revolution", in which phlogistic societies have the inherent potential for revolution and calxified ones do not, either through a lack of necessary conditions or through the successful completion of a revolution. Although his original phlogiston scientific theory has since been discredited the metaphor has stuck.

    Political factions are fairly loosely defined in this early period, though largely defined along confessional lines at this stage. By far the dominant two are the Undines (secular spagyrics) and Sylphs (Anabaptists and radical reformers), with both in agreement on such issues as the primacy of local control, the necessity of keeping politics out of the business of religion, religious toleration and a peaceful foreign and domestic policy. They are, naturally opposed by the Salamanders (Magisterial Protestants) and Gnomes (Catholics). All four contain hermetic and dynamic wings, with some dynamic Undines even floating a civil religion/Cult of Reason focused around a metaphoric interpretation of Hermes Trismegistus. It doesn't go anywhere at the time but it may or may not come back in a big way...
     
    Several ideologies
  • Ok so, idk if these two ideas I have, have been done already, or if their kind of flat, but I still think I'd share them:

    Post-Nuclear Free-Market Anarchism: Essentially, this one is kind of like Posadism, except that instead of Communism being the Post-Nuclear ideology, it's essentially anarcho-capitalism. Essentially, the state creates nuclear weapons and, states eventually nuke each other, and thus, after the nuclear war, the survivors shall realize the folly of the state and embrace anarchism and free markets to prevent the rise of another tyrannical regulating state which shall lead to the same outcome of the previous ones (nuclear war).

    Monarcho-Democracy (still thinking of a better title): The King/Queen shall have absolute power, but they shall use it to uphold democracy and liberty, if not for the Monarch, then tryanny would reign!
     
    Yeomanism
  • Yeomanism
    "Tired of living in a city and having to buy groceries? With Yeomanism, you get to be a subsistence farmer, living off the land with your family. In fact, you don't just get to be, you have to be! Ready to undo centuries of urbanization overnight? Great! Pick up a hand scythe and skim some Wikipedia pages on crop rotation, cause we're about to go repopulate Old Sarum."

    Ok, I'll go out of character now...

    Economically, it's a sort of libertarian market socialism, although the market is maybe somewhere in between a gift economy and what we would think of as a market. There is personal property but no private ownership of production. Culturally, it varies a little from village to village, but in general it's a mix of enlightenment-liberal-style "individual rights" and stuffy "father knows best". They pride themselves on having a "strong, healthy rule of law" but so do most ideologies so that doesn't mean much. There is basically no inequality of wealth but there are other forms of inequality: You'll get a noticeably lighter sentence for your crimes if you're well connected to the omnipresent Good Ol' Boy Network. The federal government had been reduced to a tiny, humble, committee of bureaucrats, chosen by vote or lottery, with short term limits. Public opinion is divided over ecosystem management, the existence of an internet, censorship vs protected speech, absentee voting, and whether fiddle music is better than flute music. However, everyone who's not a social outcast agrees that cities are literally Satan.
     
    Last edited:
    Duginite Atlantis-Tartary Dichotomy
  • So, here's an idea. Basically, it's an expansion of the Duginite Atlantis-Tartary dichotomy to the world.

    Atlantis: The rulers of the world. The Western European cultural sphere and its settler colonies in North America and Australasia. Modern global society is inevitably set up as Atlanto-centric.

    Tartary: Those cultures that were subjugated to Atlantean interests, but retained a degree of independence and were able to function as second-rate powers (e.g. Russia, Japan, the Ottomans). Basically the 'Three Easts': Eastern Europe, East Asia, and the Middle East (and North Africa).

    Lemuria: Cultures completely subjugated to Atlantis but not eradicated. South and Southeast Asia and Subsaharan Africa.

    Mu: Cultures that Atlantis almost completely eradicated. The natives of the Americas and Oceania.

    Note that Latin America is conspicuously absent, as I couldn't really fit it into any category. But this could be a bonus, seeing as Latin America (or El Dorado) incorporates cultural features from Atlantis, Lemuria, and Mu, and with a stretch Tartary as well (Brazil has the highest population of Japanese outside of Japan, for instance), making them foredestined to lead the world (or something like that).
     
    Bionationalism & Clanarchism New
  • Here's two I've been sitting on:

    Bionationalism

    Unique to North America, bionationalism is a development of bioregionalism, which states that cultures/nations are unique to their bioregions and should remain fixed to them. The United States, Canada, and Mexico are false constructs and should be dismantled into multiple bionational states, in a loose confederacy (really more like a mutual aid pact) stretching from the Arctic to Guatemala. The result of cross-pollination between Cascadian and Quebecois independence movements, the movement has also welcomed factions arguing for an independent Deseret, Texas, New England, Aztlan, Alaska, Appalachia, and other similar states.

    Clanarchism, or the Highland System

    Fusing the pan-Celtic ecofascism of their Irish benefactors with clan-based corporatism, the United Clans of the Highlands have a unique political structure. Citizenship and belonging to a clan are inseparable, as it is the clan that guarantees rights and lobbies on behalf of its members. Should two clans come into conflict, the dispute is settled via ritualised warfare. The UCH's 'government', such as it is, is more-or-less an association of clans agreeing on certain policies, such as the official religion being Wiccatholicism, strict degrowth policies, aiming to eventually return to a decentralised quasi-medieval state, as well as a nationalist foreign policy, seeing the competing Republic of Scotland as too English. The Highlands are probably one of the best places to live in the Gaian Union of Nations, but when your compatriots include North Wales and its 'Jwtse Cymreig', that's a low bar to clear.
     
    Top